Stanley Hall v. Charles Ryan, et al
CHARLES L. RYAN, named as Charles L Rayan and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA |
SLOCUM, First Name Unknown; CO II, MICHAEL F. VALENZUELA, EVANS, First Name Unknown; Asst. Deputy Warden, J. ROBERTS, Warden, HETRICK, First Name Unknown; Captain over security, FRIERSON, First Name Unknown, O'LEARY, First Name Unknown; CO III, BLAKE JENSON, Warden, N. CORDERA, Pyic. Associate, DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and WHITE, First Name Unknown; CO III |
STANLEY HALL |
20-15111 |
January 28, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Stanley Hall letter dated 03/09/2020 re: affidavits in support of emergency motion. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11640961] (CW) [Entered: 03/25/2020 07:40 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Stanley Hall motion to expedite case. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/02/2020. [11623283] (CW) [Entered: 03/09/2020 02:53 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Stanley Hall EMERGENCY motion re type of appeal opened. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/05/2020. [11592632] (CW) [Entered: 02/11/2020 08:50 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Stanley Hall letter dated 01/24/2020 re: statement of facts in question. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11580704] (CW) [Entered: 01/31/2020 10:36 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Stanley Hall letter dated 01/20/2020 re: notice of appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11580714] (CW) [Entered: 01/31/2020 10:38 AM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11576150] (JMR) [Entered: 01/28/2020 09:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.