United Specialty Insurance Com v. Hachiman, LLC, et al
| ALEXANDER POTASI, JOHNARO LAIRD, MARINA LAIRD and DEREK FESOLAI |
| UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| CRAIG PARKS, LACY'S, LLC, DBA Lacy's, PALOMINO CLUB, LLC, DBA Palomino Club, ADAM GENTILE and HACHIMAN, LLC, DBA Lacy's, DBA Palomino Club, LLC |
| 20-15210 |
| February 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - SEPARATE CONFERENCE CALLS - DIAL-IN Conference w/ appellants only, 4/14/2020, 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time, and, DIAL-IN Conference w/ appellee only, 4/15/2020, 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11655402] (BLS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 04/07/2020, 2:30 p.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11643259] (BLS) [Entered: 03/26/2020 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 03/26/2020, 2:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11609862] (BLS) [Entered: 02/26/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/19/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11602544]. [20-15210] (AD) [Entered: 02/19/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Adam Gentile, Hachiman, LLC, Lacy's, LLC, Palomino Club, LLC and Craig Parks Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/19/2020. [11602513] [20-15210] (Whitmire, James) [Entered: 02/19/2020 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC) The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of timely filed motions listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motions. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motions, appellants shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellants intend to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motions, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11596201] (TSP) [Entered: 02/13/2020 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, amended 2/7/20. [11596176] (CW) [Entered: 02/13/2020 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Adam Gentile, Hachiman, LLC, Lacy's, LLC, Palomino Club, LLC and Craig Parks Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/19/2020. Appellants Adam Gentile, Hachiman, LLC, Lacy's, LLC, Palomino Club, LLC and Craig Parks opening brief due 04/15/2020. Appellee United Specialty Insurance Company answering brief due 05/15/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11595054] (RT) [Entered: 02/12/2020 01:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
