Adam Nunez v. Pinal County Sheriff's Office, et al
Defendant: R. FERNANDO, #2259; Police Officer with Casa Grande Police Department, CASA GRANDE CITY POLICE, public law enforcers, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as "The City of Casa Grande, The Officers with the capacity of Supervisor's, Municipal Corporation", UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "Public Defender, Public Defender's Office of Pinal County at Corporation of Government", UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "A Person responsible for clerifcal duties, Pinal County Magistrate Clerk at Corporation of Government", PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY, Pinal County State Attorney Office of AZ at Corporation of Government, UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "A Person responsible for clerical duties, Eloy Justice Court Clerk of Court at a Municipal Corporation of Government", UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as "3 to 4 Unknown Public Enforcement Officers, in Casa Grande, Pinal County Law Enforcement Officers" and CITY OF CASA GRANDE, A Municipal Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: RUSTY FERNANDO, #2259 Officer with Pinal County Sheriff Department, PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, a municipal corporation and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as three other G.O.S.T. unit officers, public law enforcement officers, Pinal County Sheriff/Casa Grande City
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM ROBERT NUNEZ
Case Number: 20-15225
Filed: February 13, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 22, 2021 ADAM NUNEZ V. PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11640907] (CKP) [Entered: 03/25/2020 04:45 AM]
March 23, 2020 Filing 7 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated. [11640099] (NAC) [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:53 AM]
March 20, 2020 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Adam Robert Nunez motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11639014] (NAC) [Entered: 03/23/2020 03:08 PM]
March 18, 2020 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The court has received and reviewed appellants response to this courts February 18, 2020 order to show cause. Appellant attests that he delivered the notice of appeal to prison authorities on February 10, 2020, within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c)(1). Accordingly, the order to show cause is discharged. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [11634179] (AF) [Entered: 03/18/2020 02:00 PM]
March 12, 2020 Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11627776] (CKP) [Entered: 03/12/2020 12:37 PM]
March 5, 2020 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Adam Robert Nunez response to order to show cause re: declaration [11622381] (RR) [Entered: 03/09/2020 10:43 AM]
February 18, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district court judgment was entered on the docket on January 10, 2020. Appellants notice of appeal from that judgment was dated February 10, 2020, but was not filed until February 12, 2020. Thus, the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the entry of the judgment. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Because appellant is a pro se prisoner, however, the notice of appeal is deemed filed when it was delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Accordingly, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall file with this court a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date on which the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions internal mail system and whether first-class postage was prepaid, or otherwise show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [11599813] (CKP) [Entered: 02/18/2020 11:34 AM]
February 13, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Adam Robert Nunez opening brief due 04/13/2020. (No appearance for Appellees, no answering brief deadlines set) [11596481] (HC) [Entered: 02/13/2020 12:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adam Nunez v. Pinal County Sheriff's Office, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. FERNANDO, #2259; Police Officer with Casa Grande Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CASA GRANDE CITY POLICE, public law enforcers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as "The City of Casa Grande, The Officers with the capacity of Supervisor's, Municipal Corporation"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "Public Defender, Public Defender's Office of Pinal County at Corporation of Government"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "A Person responsible for clerifcal duties, Pinal County Magistrate Clerk at Corporation of Government"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY, Pinal County State Attorney Office of AZ at Corporation of Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as "A Person responsible for clerical duties, Eloy Justice Court Clerk of Court at a Municipal Corporation of Government"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as "3 to 4 Unknown Public Enforcement Officers, in Casa Grande, Pinal County Law Enforcement Officers"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF CASA GRANDE, A Municipal Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RUSTY FERNANDO, #2259 Officer with Pinal County Sheriff Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, a municipal corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as three other G.O.S.T. unit officers, public law enforcement officers, Pinal County Sheriff/Casa Grande City
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ADAM ROBERT NUNEZ
Represented By: Adam Robert Nunez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?