Cynthia Wright v. Andrew Saul
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| CYNTHIA L. WRIGHT |
| 20-15248 |
| February 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Streamlined request [9] by Appellant Cynthia L. Wright to extend time to file the brief is not approved because the appeal was dismissed for failure to resond to order. You will have to file a written motion. [11664975] (JN) [Entered: 04/17/2020 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Cynthia L. Wright. New requested due date is 05/20/2020. [11664938] [20-15248] (Shepherd, Betsy) [Entered: 04/17/2020 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Betsy Ruth Shepherd for party(s) Appellant Cynthia L. Wright, in case 20-15248. [11664928] (JFF) [Entered: 04/17/2020 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Betsy Ruth Shepherd (Betsy R. Shepherd 425 Riverwalk Manor Drive, Dallas, GA 30132) for Appellant Cynthia L. Wright. Date of service: 04/17/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11664895] [20-15248] (Shepherd, Betsy) [Entered: 04/17/2020 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: TSP) Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 02/28/2020),This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11657700] (TSP) [Entered: 04/10/2020 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Attorney Carolyn Beth Chen in 20-15248 substituted by Attorney Elizabeth Firer in 20-15248 [11619916] (JFF) [Entered: 03/05/2020 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Elizabeth Firer (OGC/SSA) for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Carolyn Beth Chen for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. Date of service: 03/05/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11619888] [20-15248] (Firer, Elizabeth) [Entered: 03/05/2020 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the Ninth Cir. Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See FRAP 33 & Ninth Cir.R. 33-1. Mediation assessment conferences are not routinely scheduled in social security appeals. Csl are encouraged to contact circuit mediator if they believe this social security appeal has remand potential or is otherwise amenable to resolution. Specifically, csl are requested to contact the mediator if claimant has been awarded benefits after the district court's decision or if claimant is deceased. The mediator can also assist csl with procedural matters that may lead to the resolution of an appeal. Csl for the party contacting the Mediation Program are encouraged to copy csl for the other party to the appeal on any such requests. Info regarding the medation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11614334] (BLS) [Entered: 03/02/2020 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11612124] (TSP) [Entered: 02/28/2020 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Cynthia L. Wright Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/26/2020. Appellant Cynthia L. Wright opening brief due 04/20/2020. Appellee Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security answering brief due 05/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11601350] (JMR) [Entered: 02/19/2020 09:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
