Michael Alexander v. CA Dept of Motor Vehicles, et al
CITY OF PACIFICA, ANNE BOULIANE, Judge, SUE VATERLAUS, Mayor, DAN STIEDLE, Chief, DANNY CHOU, B. SMITH, individually and in their official capacity, THEODORE OLSON, MICHAEL HARTMAN, CRISTINA MAZZEI, NEGREEN ABRISHAMCAR, individually and in their capacity, GERALD BUCHWALD, SAN MATEO COUNTY DISTRICT, AMARRA LEE, JEFFREY FINIGAN, SHARON CHO, JEAN SHIOMOTO, Commissioner, JONATHAN KARESH, HEATHER FINLAYSON, RICHARD DUBOIS, JOE ROSS, MARK FORCUM, NANCY FINEMAN, LELAND DAVIS III, RAYMOND SWOPE, PACIFICA POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH SCOTT and STEPHEN M. WAGSTAFFE, District Attorney |
SAN MATEO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, en banc, CA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, K. COX, D.S.M.1 individually and in their official capacity and RON MORTENSON, individually and in their official capacity |
MICHAEL ALEXANDER |
20-15252 |
February 19, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Michael Alexander FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/16/2020. [11663456] (RL) [Entered: 04/16/2020 03:09 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Michael Alexander statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 04/15/2020. [11663447] (RL) [Entered: 04/16/2020 03:07 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court revoked appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found that the action was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, see Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5), OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11628406] (OC) [Entered: 03/12/2020 04:16 PM] |
Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-15252: Due] ). [11624743] (CO) [Entered: 03/10/2020 01:03 PM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/28/2020 ORDER. Order revoking in forma pauperis status for appeal. [11615315] (RL) [Entered: 03/02/2020 03:39 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11606750] (CKP) [Entered: 02/24/2020 01:38 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Alexander opening brief due 04/20/2020. [11601513] (JMR) [Entered: 02/19/2020 10:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.