Adam Lopez v. Brown, et al
| SMITH, ENENMOH, Chief Medical Executive, ROSS, Physician's Assistant, JACKSON, Doctor, BROWN, Doctor, CHIPENDO, Doctor, K. ALLISON, Warden and METS, Doctor |
| ADAM RAY LOPEZ |
| 20-15262 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11658711] (CKP) [Entered: 04/13/2020 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 04/05/2020. [Case Number 20-15262: Partially Paid] [11656576] (RL) [Entered: 04/09/2020 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11645540] (CKP) [Entered: 03/30/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Adam Ray Lopez addendum to motion for assignment of counsel. Dated 02/29/2020. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11619755] (RL) [Entered: 03/05/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11613352] (CKP) [Entered: 02/28/2020 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Adam Ray Lopez motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/05/2020. [11602855] (JMR) [Entered: 02/20/2020 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Adam Ray Lopez opening brief due 04/06/2020. [11602816] (JMR) [Entered: 02/20/2020 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
