Kevin Allen v. V. Bentacourt, et al
| R. VALDOVINOS, SANDAVAL, Lieutenant, V. BENTACOURT and S. OCHOA, Officer |
| KEVIN ALLEN |
| 20-15265 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and ERIC D. MILLER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable); WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11643748] (JBS) [Entered: 03/27/2020 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Kevin Allen (Informal: Yes) opening brief of 25 pages. Served on 03/05/2020. [11627994] (KWG) [Entered: 03/12/2020 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kevin Allen opening brief due 04/14/2020. [11602898] (JMR) [Entered: 02/20/2020 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
