Barbara Pinkston v. Sheryl Foster, et al
| BARBARA ANNE PINKSTON |
| SHERYL FOSTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 20-15276 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by May 19, 2020. [11637336] (JMR) [Entered: 03/20/2020 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Barbara Anne Pinkston Motion to extend time to file COA request. Date of service: 03/20/2020. [11636984]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [2].] (SLM) [Entered: 03/20/2020 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 3 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Barbara Anne Pinkston Correspondence: NOTICE: The Court is notified that due to logistical issues related to the COVID-19 virus, Barbara Pinkston requires a 60 day extension of time to file the Application for Certificate of Appealability, currently due on March 20, 2020.. Date of service: 03/20/2020 [11636865] [20-15276] (Teicher, Lori) [Entered: 03/20/2020 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 01/16/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11604476] (JBS) [Entered: 02/21/2020 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
