Peter Gardner, et al v. Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk, et al
Defendant / Appellant: HUGGINS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. and BLISS SEQUOIA INSURANCE & RISK ADVISORS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHRISTIAN GARDNER, Individually and on behalf of L. G. and PETER GARDNER, Individually and on behalf of L. G.
Case Number: 20-15289
Filed: February 21, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2020 Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LK) The parties stipulated motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Costs and fees shall be allocated pursuant to the parties stipulation. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11618423] (JPD) [Entered: 03/04/2020 03:36 PM]
February 28, 2020 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc. and Huggins Insurance Services, Inc. Stipulated Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 02/28/2020. [11612736] [20-15289] (Lee, Patricia) [Entered: 02/28/2020 12:14 PM]
February 27, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC):A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because an order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or a timely raised defect in removal procedure is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise under 28 U.S.C. 1447(d). See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127 (1995); Kunzi v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 833 F.2d 1291, 1293 (9th Cir. 1987). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11611780] (JPD) [Entered: 02/27/2020 04:23 PM]
February 21, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc. and Huggins Insurance Services, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/28/2020. Appellants Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc. and Huggins Insurance Services, Inc. opening brief due 04/22/2020. Appellees Christian Gardner and Peter Gardner answering brief due 05/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11605444] (RT) [Entered: 02/21/2020 05:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Peter Gardner, et al v. Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: HUGGINS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Patricia Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BLISS SEQUOIA INSURANCE & RISK ADVISORS, INC.
Represented By: Patricia Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: CHRISTIAN GARDNER, Individually and on behalf of L. G.
Represented By: Donald Jude Campbell Esquire
Represented By: Philip Erwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: PETER GARDNER, Individually and on behalf of L. G.
Represented By: Donald Jude Campbell Esquire
Represented By: Philip Erwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?