Vinton Frost v. USDOJ, et al
| ALEX G. TSE, SARA WINSLOW, JAMES SCHARF, BRIAN STRETCH and UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE |
| VINTON P. FROST |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 20-15298 |
| February 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Received Appellant Vinton P. Frost notice that appellant is in comliance with the court order. [11668272] (NAC) [Entered: 04/22/2020 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed Appellant Vinton P. Frost statement that appeal should go forward. [11666590] (NAC) [Entered: 04/21/2020 07:27 AM] |
| Filing 10 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request filed on 03/27/2020. [11646722] (JR) [Entered: 03/31/2020 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Vinton P. Frost motion for pro se relief, request for copy of rules. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/26/2020. [11646301] (QDL) [Entered: 03/30/2020 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Vinton P. Frost motion to transfer documents copies to the appeals court. Deficiencies: None. [11637838] (NAC) [Entered: 03/23/2020 07:41 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Vinton P. Frost motion for administrative relief. Deficiencies: None.. [11637834] (NAC) [Entered: 03/23/2020 07:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11630228] (RT) [Entered: 03/13/2020 05:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-15298: Due] ). [11626318] (CO) [Entered: 03/11/2020 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Vinton P. Frost motion for presentation of IFP Status. Deficiencies: None. [11623889] (NAC) [Entered: 03/10/2020 07:38 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/02/2020. Revoking In Forma Pauperis Status [11623890] (NAC) [Entered: 03/10/2020 07:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11613316] (CKP) [Entered: 02/28/2020 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Vinton P. Frost opening brief due 04/20/2020. [11606505] (JPD) [Entered: 02/24/2020 11:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
