Gregory Goodman v. Laura Donnelly, et al
REBECCA HERNANDEZ, MADELINE TURPENING, DOTSON-BARKLEY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Trinity Personel; Corizon Personel and LAURIE LECLAIR |
LAURA DONNELLY, individual & official capacity; Registered Dietician at Trinity Food Service Group Inc. and LORI JOHNSON, individual & official capacity; Facility Health Administrator at Yuma Complex |
GREGORY EDWARD GOODMAN |
20-15310 |
February 25, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
GREGORY GOODMAN V. LAURA DONNELLY |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11668185] (CKP) [Entered: 04/22/2020 10:26 AM] |
Filing 11 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 04/13/2020. [Case Number 20-15310: Partially Paid] [11666510] (CW) [Entered: 04/20/2020 06:47 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the docket reflects that appellant has failed to respond to the court's February 28, 2020 order. Within 60 days after the date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. The Clerk shall send a copy of the February 28, 2020 order to appellant along with this order. [11651745] (CKP) [Entered: 04/05/2020 02:03 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed Appellant Gregory Edward Goodman motion for extension to respond to appellees response. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/27/2020. [11651044] (RL) [Entered: 04/03/2020 11:35 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Laura Donnelly response to motion ([ # 5 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 03/19/2020. [11635246] [20-15310] (Dunn, Bradley) [Entered: 03/19/2020 11:36 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Gregory Edward Goodman motion for injunctive relief. Deficiencies: None. No service date. [11632925] (RL) [Entered: 03/17/2020 03:21 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Gregory Edward Goodman FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/01/2020. [11628182] (RL) [Entered: 03/12/2020 02:56 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Gregory Edward Goodman FORM 27 motion for injunctive relief and monetary damages. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/01/2020. [11628177] (RL) [Entered: 03/12/2020 02:54 PM] |
Filing 4 Attorney Jaric William Erike substituted by Attorney Rita Bustos in 20-15310. [11617114] (HH) [Entered: 03/03/2020 04:17 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Rita J. Bustos (Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. 2390 E. Camelback Rd, Suite 440 Phoenix, AZ 85016) for Appellees Laura Donnelly and Lori Johnson. Substitution for Jaric William Erike, Esquire for Appellee Lori Johnson and Anthony J. Fernandez for Appellee Lori Johnson. Date of service: 03/03/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11617107] [20-15310] (Bustos, Rita) [Entered: 03/03/2020 04:14 PM] |
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11613151] (CKP) [Entered: 02/28/2020 02:33 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gregory Edward Goodman opening brief due 04/20/2020. Appellees Laura Donnelly and Lori Johnson answering brief due 05/19/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11608876] (JPD) [Entered: 02/25/2020 04:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.