Jeremy Pinson v. BOP, et al
| JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON |
| ANN ASH, Medical Doctor, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-15328 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Jeremy Vaughn Pinson opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 03/10/2020. [11671486] (KT) [Entered: 04/24/2020 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (MARY H. MURGUIA, JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. We conclude that appellant has had at least three prior actions or appeals dismissed for a qualifying reason under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). See Stine & Pinson v. John Doe, No. 14-6160 (4th Cir. Apr. 29, 2014) (dismissing appeal as frivolous); Pinson v. Lappin, No. 11-1099 (10th Cir. Sept. 21, 2011) (dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute after concluding that appeal was frivolous); Pinson v. Chipi, No. 10-12235 (11th Cir. Feb. 2, 2011) (dismissing appeal as frivolous). However, appellants filings demonstrate that appellant has alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury.... Accordingly, appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Because appellant is a prisoner, appellant must pay the $505 filing and docketing fees over time, if appellant wants this appeal to go forward. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (2). If appellant wants to pay the $505 over time to allow this appeal to go forward, appellant must, within 21 days after the date of this order... If appellant does not file the completed authorization form with the court within 21 days after the date of this order, the Clerk will dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.The Clerk shall file the opening brief received on March 23, 2020 (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]). Because there is no appearance by appellees, briefing will be completed upon the filing of the opening brief. The Clerk shall serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [11668931] (WL) [Entered: 04/22/2020 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the opening brief in response to his letter of request filed on 03/23/2020. [11641114] (JR) [Entered: 03/25/2020 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Jeremy Vaughn Pinson letter dated 03/10/2020 re: copy of docket sheet and opening brief filed. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11639070] (JFF) [Entered: 03/23/2020 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jeremy Vaughn Pinson motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/10/2020. [11639067] (JFF) [Entered: 03/23/2020 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Jeremy Vaughn Pinson opening brief (Informal: Yes) 6 pages. Served on 03/10/2020. Major deficiencies: motion pending. [11638925] (KWG) [Entered: 03/23/2020 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jeremy Vaughn Pinson motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11625371] (RR) [Entered: 03/10/2020 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11613005] (CKP) [Entered: 02/28/2020 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jeremy Vaughn Pinson opening brief due 05/04/2020. [11611622] (RT) [Entered: 02/27/2020 03:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
