USA v. Jasen Dushane
JASEN LYNN DUSHANE |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-15342 |
March 2, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Jasen Lynn Dushane motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies. [11632095] (JFF) [Entered: 03/17/2020 09:52 AM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 01/16/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11614546] (JMR) [Entered: 03/02/2020 11:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Jasen Dushane | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JASEN LYNN DUSHANE | |
Represented By: | Dwight M. Samuel |
Represented By: | Jasen Lynn Dushane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Matthew D. Segal |
Represented By: | Kurt Didier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.