Student A, et al v. San Francisco Unified School D, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: STUDENT B, by and through Parent B, his Guardian, STUDENT D, by and through Parent D, her Guardian, STUDENT A, by and through Parent A, her Guardian, STUDENT E, by and through Parent E, her Guardian, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and STUDENT C, by and through Parent C, his Guardian
Defendant / Appellee: VINCENT MATTHEWS, In his Official Capacity as the Superintendent for the San Francisco Unified School District and SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case Number: 20-15386
Filed: March 5, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 18, 2021 Summary Student A v. San Francisco Unified School District

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2020 Filing 14 Added Attorney Christina M. Krokee for Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E, in case 20-15386. [11677293] (HH) [Entered: 04/30/2020 04:13 PM]
April 30, 2020 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christina M. Krokee (525 University Avenue, Suite 1400, Palo Alto, CA 94301) for Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E. Date of service: 04/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11677275] [20-15386] (Krokee, Christina) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:59 PM]
April 30, 2020 Filing 12 Added Attorney Jose R. Allen for Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E, in case 20-15386. [11677267] (HH) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:56 PM]
April 30, 2020 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jose R. Allen (525 University Avenue, Suite 1400, Palo Alto, CA 94301) for Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E. Date of service: 04/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11677245] [20-15386] (Allen, Jose) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:46 PM]
April 30, 2020 Filing 10 Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: EU): Updated deadlines. Automatic 60-day extension (notice filed at Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E opening brief due 08/10/2020. Appellees Vincent Matthews and San Francisco Unified School District answering brief due 09/09/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11676728] (EU) [Entered: 04/30/2020 11:45 AM]
April 30, 2020 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E Correspondence: Notice Regarding Extension of Brief. Date of service: 04/30/2020 [11676642] [20-15386] (Kim, Jinny) [Entered: 04/30/2020 11:02 AM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Beatriz Berumen for party(s) Appellee San Francisco Unified School District Appellee Vincent Matthews, in case 20-15386. [11655385] (NAC) [Entered: 04/08/2020 01:10 PM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Beatriz Berumen (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 3 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95825) for Appellees Vincent Matthews and San Francisco Unified School District. Date of service: 04/08/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11655364] [20-15386] (Berumen, Beatriz) [Entered: 04/08/2020 12:46 PM]
April 1, 2020 Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Elizabeth Bixby for party(s) Appellant Student D Appellant Student E Appellant Student B Appellant Student C Appellant Student A, in case 20-15386. [11648716] (NAC) [Entered: 04/01/2020 01:09 PM]
April 1, 2020 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Elizabeth A. Bixby (Legal Aid at Work, 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94104) for Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E. Date of service: 04/01/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11648664] [20-15386] (Bixby, Elizabeth) [Entered: 04/01/2020 12:44 PM]
March 23, 2020 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/06/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11639321] (BLS) [Entered: 03/23/2020 05:07 PM]
March 11, 2020 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/11/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11626296]. [20-15386] (AD) [Entered: 03/11/2020 12:44 PM]
March 11, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/11/2020. [11626013] [20-15386] (Kim, Jinny) [Entered: 03/11/2020 10:53 AM]
March 5, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/12/2020. Transcript ordered by 04/02/2020. Transcript due 05/04/2020. Appellants Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D and Student E opening brief due 06/11/2020. Appellees Vincent Matthews and San Francisco Unified School District answering brief due 07/13/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11620085] (RT) [Entered: 03/05/2020 05:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Student A, et al v. San Francisco Unified School D, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STUDENT B, by and through Parent B, his Guardian
Represented By: Mark T. Johnson
Represented By: Shawna Parks
Represented By: Guy B. Wallace
Represented By: Jinny Kim
Represented By: Alexis Michelle Alvarez
Represented By: Elizabeth Bixby
Represented By: Jose R. Allen
Represented By: Christina M. Krokee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STUDENT D, by and through Parent D, her Guardian
Represented By: Mark T. Johnson
Represented By: Shawna Parks
Represented By: Guy B. Wallace
Represented By: Jinny Kim
Represented By: Alexis Michelle Alvarez
Represented By: Elizabeth Bixby
Represented By: Jose R. Allen
Represented By: Christina M. Krokee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STUDENT A, by and through Parent A, her Guardian
Represented By: Mark T. Johnson
Represented By: Shawna Parks
Represented By: Guy B. Wallace
Represented By: Jinny Kim
Represented By: Alexis Michelle Alvarez
Represented By: Elizabeth Bixby
Represented By: Jose R. Allen
Represented By: Christina M. Krokee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STUDENT E, by and through Parent E, her Guardian, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Represented By: Mark T. Johnson
Represented By: Shawna Parks
Represented By: Guy B. Wallace
Represented By: Jinny Kim
Represented By: Alexis Michelle Alvarez
Represented By: Elizabeth Bixby
Represented By: Jose R. Allen
Represented By: Christina M. Krokee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STUDENT C, by and through Parent C, his Guardian
Represented By: Mark T. Johnson
Represented By: Shawna Parks
Represented By: Guy B. Wallace
Represented By: Jinny Kim
Represented By: Alexis Michelle Alvarez
Represented By: Elizabeth Bixby
Represented By: Jose R. Allen
Represented By: Christina M. Krokee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VINCENT MATTHEWS, In his Official Capacity as the Superintendent for the San Francisco Unified School District
Represented By: Mark Saul Posard
Represented By: Beatriz Berumen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Represented By: Mark Saul Posard
Represented By: Beatriz Berumen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?