Michael McLaughlin v. Brian Williams, et al
MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN |
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
20-15406 |
March 10, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Michael T. McLaughlin motion to take judicial notice . Deficiencies: case closed. Served on 04/07/2020. [11661243] (CW) [Entered: 04/14/2020 06:07 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and ERIC D. MILLER): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants request for judicial notice, filed in the district court on the same date as the notice of appeal, complains of the district courts delay in deciding his pending petition for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant has not filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. If appellant wishes to seek relief by way of a petition for writ of mandamus, he must file the petition as an original action in this court. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district judge. DISMISSED. [11647039] (AF) [Entered: 03/31/2020 11:22 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Michael T. McLaughlin motion to take judicial notice. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/24/2020. [11646536] (CW) [Entered: 03/31/2020 07:50 AM] |
Filing 3 Received Appellant Michael T. McLaughlin designation of reporter's transcript form. [11637282] (JFF) [Entered: 03/20/2020 03:54 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Michael T. McLaughlin letter dated 03/17/2020 re: case should be a interlocutory appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11637277] (JFF) [Entered: 03/20/2020 03:53 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11624143] (JMR) [Entered: 03/10/2020 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.