Renard Polk v. Attorney General for the State, et al
| LENARD VARE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| RENARD TRUMAN POLK |
| 20-15425 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KENNETH K. LEE) Appellants motion for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. Any motion for reconsideration is due by June 10, 2020. [11683497] (WL) [Entered: 05/07/2020 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Renard Truman Polk motion for ext of time to file mtn for recon. Deficiencies: None. [11676884] (RR) [Entered: 04/30/2020 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) This appeal is from the district courts orders dated July 30, 2019, and March 3, 2020. Appellants appeal is timely as to both orders based on the request for a certificate of appealability he filed in the district court on August 8, 2019 and the notice of appeal he filed on March 11, 2020 The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 530-31 (2005); Ortiz v. Stewart, 195 F.3d 520, 520-21 (9th Cir. 1999). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11664666] (RY) [Entered: 04/17/2020 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/03/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11628054] (RT) [Entered: 03/12/2020 02:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
