Larry Smith v. J. Gonzales, et al
A. ESQUERRA, GONZALES and MINER |
G. MEIER, E. CASTRO, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, A. SCAIFE, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, J. GONZALES, Program Sergeant at CSP-Corcoran, A. FRITZ, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, FLOREZ, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, POTZERNITZ, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran and B. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran |
LARRY SMITH |
20-15440 |
March 16, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Received copy of motion filed in district court request the DC to certify it's order to grant in part(s) summary judgment. Motion filed by Appellant Larry Smith. [11667853] (RR) [Entered: 04/21/2020 05:26 PM] |
Filing 13 Filed Appellant Larry Smith letter dated 04/12/2020 re: Request for Rules book. Paper filing deficiency: None. (sent copy of rules book) [11662177] (RL) [Entered: 04/15/2020 03:39 PM] |
Filing 12 Filed Appellant Larry Smith letter dated 04/12/2020 re: Request for information regarding case and request for rules book. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent copy of docket sheet & rules book) [11662037] (RL) [Entered: 04/15/2020 02:28 PM] |
Filing 11 Received original and 1 copy of Appellant Larry Smith opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 04/15/2020. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiencies: briefing is stayed (motions to appoint counsel and dismiss case are pending), no certificate of service on appellees' counsel. [11661724] (LA) [Entered: 04/15/2020 11:35 AM] |
Filing 10 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11655655] (CKP) [Entered: 04/08/2020 03:09 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellees E. Castro, Florez, A. Fritz, J. Gonzales, B. Johnson, G. Meier, Potzernitz and A. Scaife Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 04/08/2020. [11655493] [20-15440] (Mathison, James) [Entered: 04/08/2020 01:58 PM] |
Filing 8 Received notice of change of address dated from Larry Smith. New address: California Health Care Facility, Stockton Facility B, P.O. Box 32110, Stockton, CA 95213. [11653240]--[Edited: address updated. 04/06/2020 by SLM] (JFF) [Entered: 04/06/2020 04:53 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Larry Smith letter dated re: questions on case. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11653223] (JFF) [Entered: 04/06/2020 04:44 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Larry Smith letter dated re: Form 29. Request for Docket Sheet, Document, or Rules. Paper filing deficiency:. [11653134] (JFF) [Entered: 04/06/2020 04:13 PM] |
Filing 5 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 03/30/2020. [Case Number 20-15440: Partially Paid] [11653121] (JFF) [Entered: 04/06/2020 04:09 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Larry Smith motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11653111] (JFF) [Entered: 04/06/2020 04:07 PM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/23/2020, denying appellant's motion to appoint counsel. [11638204] (DL) [Entered: 03/23/2020 10:04 AM] |
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11634188] (CKP) [Entered: 03/18/2020 02:02 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT . SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Larry Smith opening brief due 05/11/2020. Appellees E. Castro, Florez, A. Fritz, J. Gonzales, B. Johnson, G. Meier, Potzernitz and A. Scaife answering brief due 06/09/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11630966] (JPD) [Entered: 03/16/2020 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.