William Uschold, et al v. Carriage Services, Inc., et al
| CARRIAGE CEMETERY SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California Corporation and CARRIAGE FUNERAL SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. |
| TON SAECHAO, TIANA NAPLES, WILLIAM USCHOLD, each individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and JOSE ALAMENDAREZ |
| CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation |
| 20-15523 |
| March 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SJS) The dial-in telephone assessment conference previously scheduled for April 30, 2020, is canceled. Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [11670659] (WL) [Entered: 04/24/2020 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jose Alamendarez, Tiana Naples, Ton Saechao and William Uschold Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal]. Date of service: 04/22/2020. [11669133] [20-15523] (Benjamin, Na'il) [Entered: 04/22/2020 08:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 04/30/2020, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11657182] (CL) [Entered: 04/10/2020 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/02/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11650662]. [20-15523] (AD) [Entered: 04/03/2020 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jose Alamendarez, William Uschold, Tiana Naples and Ton Saechao Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/02/2020. [11650635] [20-15523] (Benjamin, Na'il) [Entered: 04/02/2020 07:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Andrew Chang, Jason Richardson for party(s) Appellee Carriage Services, Inc., in case 20-15523. [11650106] (RR) [Entered: 04/02/2020 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jason M. Richardson (Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., One Montgomery, Suite 2600, San Francisco, CA 94104) for Appellee Carriage Services, Inc.. Date of service: 04/01/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11649208] [20-15523] (Richardson, Jason) [Entered: 04/01/2020 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew L. Chang (Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., One Montgomery, Suite 2600, San Francisco, California 94104) for Appellee Carriage Services, Inc.. Date of service: 04/01/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11648836] [20-15523] (Chang, Andrew) [Entered: 04/01/2020 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Fed. R. App. P. 5. In addition, a review of this courts docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either (1) move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or (2) show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, appellants shall also, within 21 days after the date of this order, either pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court motions to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11648568] (AF) [Entered: 04/01/2020 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jose Alamendarez, Tiana Naples, Ton Saechao and William Uschold Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/02/2020. Transcript ordered by 04/23/2020. Transcript due 05/26/2020. Appellants Jose Alamendarez, Tiana Naples, Ton Saechao and William Uschold opening brief due 07/02/2020. Appellee Carriage Services, Inc. answering brief due 08/03/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11642435] (JMR) [Entered: 03/26/2020 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
