Baerbel McKinney-Drobnis, et al v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC
Appellant: KURT ORESHACK
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAMILLE BERLESE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOSEPH B. PICCOLA and BAERBEL MCKINNEY-DROBNIS
Case Number: 20-15539
Filed: March 27, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 20, 2021 Summary McKinney-Drobnis v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2020 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11669406] (VS) [Entered: 04/23/2020 09:48 AM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11667892]. [20-15539] (AD) [Entered: 04/21/2020 06:44 PM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Massage Envy Franchising, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/21/2020. [11667686] [20-15539] (Sacks, Luanne) [Entered: 04/21/2020 03:28 PM]
April 7, 2020 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/21/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11654231] (VS) [Entered: 04/07/2020 01:33 PM]
April 3, 2020 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/03/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11651139]. [20-15539] (AD) [Entered: 04/03/2020 12:44 PM]
April 3, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kurt Oreshack Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/03/2020. [11650687] [20-15539] (Frank, Theodore) [Entered: 04/03/2020 08:12 AM]
March 27, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kurt Oreshack Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/03/2020. Transcript ordered by 04/27/2020. Transcript due 05/26/2020. Appellant Kurt Oreshack opening brief due 07/06/2020. Appellees Camille Berlese, Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, Baerbel McKinney-Drobnis and Joseph B. Piccola answering brief due 08/06/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11643884] (RT) [Entered: 03/27/2020 11:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Baerbel McKinney-Drobnis, et al v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC
Represented By: Kahn A. Scolnick
Represented By: Theodore J. Boutrous Esquire Jr.
Represented By: Robert Brett Bader Esquire
Represented By: Luanne Sacks
Represented By: Cynthia Ricketts Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: KURT ORESHACK
Represented By: Theodore H. Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: CAMILLE BERLESE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esquire
Represented By: Trenton R. Kashima
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JOSEPH B. PICCOLA
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esquire
Represented By: Trenton R. Kashima
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: BAERBEL MCKINNEY-DROBNIS
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esquire
Represented By: Trenton R. Kashima
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?