AdTrader, Inc., et al v. Google LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: LML CONSULT LTD., SPECIALIZED COLLECTIONS BUREAU, INC., CLASSIC AND FOOD EOOD, ADTRADER, INC. and AD CRUNCH LTD.
Defendant / Appellee: GOOGLE LLC
Case Number: 20-15542
Filed: March 27, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 30, 2021 Summary AdTrader, Inc. v. Google LLC

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2020 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) UNDER SEAL Appellee Google LLC notice of intent to unseal previously sealed material. Material: other (Ex. 2 to the Declaration of Gerald Knapton in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, submitted as Ex. 4 to Defendant-Appellee Google LLC's Response to Appellants' Memorandum in Response to Order to Show Cause). Date of service: 05/13/2020. [11690273] [20-15542] (Gutkin, Jeffrey) [Entered: 05/13/2020 05:22 PM]
May 13, 2020 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellee Google LLC response to order to show cause dated 04/01/2020. Date of service: 05/13/2020. [11690149] [20-15542] (Gutkin, Jeffrey) [Entered: 05/13/2020 04:23 PM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11666908] (VS) [Entered: 04/21/2020 09:55 AM]
April 17, 2020 Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): Appellees request for an extension of time to respond to appellants memorandum in response to the courts April 1, 2020 order (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. Appellees response is due May 13, 2020. Briefing remains stayed pending further order of the court. [11664796] (OC) [Entered: 04/17/2020 03:17 PM]
April 14, 2020 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Google LLC Motion to extend time to file a reply. Date of service: 04/14/2020. [11661440]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [7].] (SLM) [Entered: 04/15/2020 09:09 AM]
April 14, 2020 Filing 7 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 8 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee Google LLC Correspondence: Notice regarding extension of time to file brief in response to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Memorandum in Response to Order to Show Cause. Date of service: 04/14/2020 [11661201] [20-15542] (Gutkin, Jeffrey) [Entered: 04/14/2020 05:05 PM]
April 10, 2020 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Ad Crunch Ltd., AdTrader, Inc., Classic and Food EOOD, LML Consult Ltd. and Specialized Collections Bureau, Inc. response to order to show cause dated 04/01/2020. Date of service: 04/10/2020. [11658246] [20-15542] (Gaw, Randolph) [Entered: 04/10/2020 06:49 PM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/20/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11654948] (VS) [Entered: 04/08/2020 08:21 AM]
April 3, 2020 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/03/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11651704]. [20-15542] (AD) [Entered: 04/03/2020 06:44 PM]
April 3, 2020 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Ad Crunch Ltd., AdTrader, Inc., Classic and Food EOOD, LML Consult Ltd. and Specialized Collections Bureau, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/03/2020. [11651402] [20-15542] (Song, Samuel) [Entered: 04/03/2020 02:44 PM]
April 1, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also Rosenfeld v. United States, 859 F.2d 717, 720 (9th Cir. 1988). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11649131] (OC) [Entered: 04/01/2020 03:27 PM]
March 27, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Ad Crunch Ltd., AdTrader, Inc., Classic and Food EOOD, LML Consult Ltd. and Specialized Collections Bureau, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/03/2020. Transcript ordered by 04/27/2020. Transcript due 05/26/2020. Appellants Ad Crunch Ltd., AdTrader, Inc., Classic and Food EOOD, LML Consult Ltd. and Specialized Collections Bureau, Inc. opening brief due 07/06/2020. Appellee Google LLC answering brief due 08/05/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11644486] (JBS) [Entered: 03/27/2020 04:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: AdTrader, Inc., et al v. Google LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LML CONSULT LTD.
Represented By: Flora Vigo
Represented By: Mark Poe
Represented By: Randolph Gaw Esquire
Represented By: Samuel S. Song
Represented By: Victor Meng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SPECIALIZED COLLECTIONS BUREAU, INC.
Represented By: Flora Vigo
Represented By: Mark Poe
Represented By: Randolph Gaw Esquire
Represented By: Samuel S. Song
Represented By: Victor Meng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CLASSIC AND FOOD EOOD
Represented By: Flora Vigo
Represented By: Mark Poe
Represented By: Randolph Gaw Esquire
Represented By: Samuel S. Song
Represented By: Victor Meng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ADTRADER, INC.
Represented By: Flora Vigo
Represented By: Mark Poe
Represented By: Randolph Gaw Esquire
Represented By: Samuel S. Song
Represented By: Victor Meng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: AD CRUNCH LTD.
Represented By: Flora Vigo
Represented By: Mark Poe
Represented By: Randolph Gaw Esquire
Represented By: Samuel S. Song
Represented By: Victor Meng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GOOGLE LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Gutkin
Represented By: Kyle Christopher Wong Esquire
Represented By: Michael Graham Rhodes Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?