Andrea Wood, et al v. County of Contra Costa, et al
| RAVINDER BAINS, in his indivdual capacity, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a government entity, EDYTH WILLIAMS, in her official and individual capacity, KELLIE CASE, in her official and invidual capacity, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a government entity, ERICA BAINS, in her individual capacity and CECELIA GUTIERREZ, in her official and individual capacity |
| TP, a minor child and ANDREA WOOD |
| 20-15553 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LCC) Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11660864] (OC) [Entered: 04/14/2020 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellants TP and Andrea Wood Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 04/12/2020. [11658585] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [10] .] (TYL) [Entered: 04/13/2020 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 10 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 11 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellants TP and Andrea Wood Correspondence: Request for Dismissal.. Date of service: 04/12/2020 [11658295] [20-15553] (Angelucci, Marc) [Entered: 04/12/2020 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is denied because the motion requests dismissal without prejudice. If appellants seek voluntary dismissal of this appeal, the motion must request dismissal with prejudice. Appellants remain obligated to comply with the courts April 1, 2020 order by either (1) moving for voluntary dismissal of the appeal with prejudice or (2) showing cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [11657903] (RY) [Entered: 04/10/2020 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants TP and Andrea Wood Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 04/07/2020. [11654768]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [7].] (SLM) [Entered: 04/07/2020 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 8 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellants TP and Andrea Wood Correspondence: Request dismissal of appeal.. Date of service: 04/07/2020 [11654689] [20-15553] (Angelucci, Marc) [Entered: 04/07/2020 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 Money order numbers 17-984767835 in the amount of $50.00 and money order number 17-984767834 in the amount of $500.00 returned to attorney Marc Angelucci @ 11734 Wilshire Boulevard, LA, CA , Ste C903, 90025 as the fee for this appeal is $505.00 and should be paid to the US District Court. [11650321] (JR) [Entered: 04/02/2020 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (order dismissing complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Further, a review of this courts docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either (1) move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or (2) show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, appellants shall also, within 21 days after the date of this order, either pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court motions to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11649121] (OC) [Entered: 04/01/2020 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/31/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11647986]. [20-15553] (AD) [Entered: 03/31/2020 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants TP and Andrea Wood Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/31/2020. [11647905] [20-15553] (Angelucci, Marc) [Entered: 03/31/2020 05:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants TP and Andrea Wood Correspondence: Notice of Errata re date on Notice of Appeal. Date of service: 03/31/2020 [11647136] [20-15553] (Angelucci, Marc) [Entered: 03/31/2020 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants TP and Andrea Wood Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/07/2020. Appellants TP and Andrea Wood opening brief due 05/29/2020. Appellees Erica Bains, Ravinder Bains, Kellie Case, County of Contra Costa, Cecelia Gutierrez, State of California and Edyth Williams answering brief due 06/29/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11646930] (JBS) [Entered: 03/31/2020 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
