Richard Thompson v. Nicole Brickner, et al
| RICHARD WAYNE THOMPSON |
| MATTHEW SMILEY and NICOLE M. BRICKNER |
| 20-15567 |
| April 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Richard Wayne Thompson motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/01/2020. [11680779] (QDL) [Entered: 05/05/2020 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Richard Wayne Thompson motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 04/24/2020. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/01/2020. [11680776] (QDL) [Entered: 05/05/2020 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (MARY H. MURGUIA, JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 30, 2020 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on June 27, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11671219] (JBS) [Entered: 04/24/2020 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Deleted Incorrect Entry [11648324] (JPD) [Entered: 04/01/2020 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPERANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Richard Wayne Thompson opening brief due 05/29/2020. [11648317] (JPD) [Entered: 04/01/2020 09:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
