Kenneth Reed v. Corizon, LLC, et al
| UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Pat Doe (fictitiously named), an administrator for Corizon LLC at ASPC Tucson and B. JOHNSTON |
| CORIZON, LLC, entity under contract to the State of Arizona, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Pat Doe (fictitiously named), BRENDA L. JOHNSTON, BONNIE A. GOODMAN, CHARLES L. RYAN and LISA LYON, the Assistant Facility Health Adminstrator for Corizon LLC at ASPC Tucson |
| KENNETH W. REED |
| 20-15571 |
| April 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11703389] [20-15571, 18-17123] (CKP) [Entered: 05/28/2020 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant in 20-15571. Dated 05/14/2020. [11703256] [18-17123, 20-15571] (RR) [Entered: 05/27/2020 10:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): The court sua sponte consolidates these appeals. Appeal Nos. 18-17123 and 20-15571 are consolidated. The following briefing schedule shall govern these consolidated appeals: the consolidated opening brief is due July 10, 2020; the consolidated answering brief is due August 10, 2020; and the consolidated optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Appellant remains obligated to submit the prisoner authorization form for appeal No. 20-15571 pursuant to this courts May 7, 2020 order in appeal No. 20-15571. [11686641] [18-17123, 20-15571] (CKP) [Entered: 05/11/2020 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of Withdrawal of Csl (ECF Filing) [4] is rejected. Filer must first have new appearance entered by replacement counsel because corporation cannot proceed pro se. [11684558] (QDL) [Entered: 05/08/2020 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Sarah Ann Schade for Appellee Corizon, LLC. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 05/07/2020. [11684324] [20-15571] (Conlon, Joseph) [Entered: 05/07/2020 05:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): This court has reviewed the notice of appeal and accompanying documents filed February 19, 2019 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 04-80003. The court previously permitted related Appeal No. 18-17123 to proceed. Accordingly, appeal No. 20-15571 shall be permitted to proceed. A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court, and that such permission has not been revoked to date. Consequently, appellants forma pauperis status continues in this court. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal when funds are available in appellant's account. Consequently, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellant's trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk shall serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. (Pro Se) [11684062] (CKP) [Entered: 05/07/2020 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kenneth W. Reed opening brief due 06/08/2020. Appellees Corizon, LLC, Bonnie A. Goodman, Brenda L. Johnston, Lisa Lyon, Charles L. Ryan and Unknown Party answering brief due 07/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11648675] (RT) [Entered: 04/01/2020 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 Filed order (MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and ERIC D. MILLER, Circuit Judges) in case no. 18-17123 on 3-26-2020: Appellants motion for reconsideration of this courts January 25, 2019 order is denied (Docket Entry No. 9). Appellants motion for a stay of appellate proceedings and remand is denied (Docket Entry No. 17). Appellants motion for an index of the trial courts record for appeal is denied (Docket Entry No. 20). Appellants motion for injunctive relief or, in the alternative, for assistance locating and securing counsel is denied (Docket Entry No. 21). Appellants motion to reset the briefing schedule is denied as moot (Docket Entry No. 22). Appellants motions for summary disposition are denied (Docket Entry Nos. 24, 25). The opening brief is due June 1, 2020; the answering brief is due July 1, 2020; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, the excerpts of record requirement is waived. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.2. Appellees supplemental excerpts of record are limited to the district court docket sheet, the notice of appeal, the judgment or order appealed from, and any specific portions of the record cited in appellees brief. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.7. The Clerk shall open a new appeal from the notice of appeal lodged in the district court on February 19, 2019. [11648668] (RT) [Entered: 04/01/2020 12:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
