Bank of America, N.A. v. T-Shack, Inc., et al
| NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. and WESTTROP ASSOCIATION |
| T-SHACK, INC. |
| BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., on behalf of BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, FKA Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP |
| 20-15627 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. V. T-SHACK, INC. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 06/19/2020. See order for details. [11709605] (CL) [Entered: 06/03/2020 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 06/03/2020, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 06/02/2020 ). [11698619] (CL) [Entered: 05/21/2020 06:36 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 06/02/2020, 11:30 a.m. Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant T-Shack, Inc. opening brief due 07/08/2020. Appellee Bank of America, N.A. answering brief due 08/07/2020. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days afer service of the answering brief. See order for details. [11690304] (CL) [Entered: 05/13/2020 06:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/13/2020, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11671060] (CL) [Entered: 04/24/2020 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/16/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11663785]. [20-15627] (AD) [Entered: 04/17/2020 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant T-Shack, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/16/2020. [11663769] [20-15627] (Yergensen, Chris) [Entered: 04/16/2020 11:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Richard Aaron Chastain, Stephen Colmery Parsley for party(s) Appellee Bank of America, N.A., in case 20-15627. [11661525] (RR) [Entered: 04/15/2020 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Richard Aaron Chastain (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, One Federal Place, 1819 5th Avenue North, Birmingham, AL 35203) for Appellee Bank of America, N.A.. Date of service: 04/15/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11661296] [20-15627] (Chastain, Richard) [Entered: 04/15/2020 06:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Stephen Colmery Parsley (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, One Federal Place, 1819 5th Avenue North, Birmingham, AL 35203) for Appellee Bank of America, N.A.. Date of service: 04/14/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11661091] [20-15627] (Parsley, Stephen) [Entered: 04/14/2020 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant T-Shack, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/16/2020. Appellant T-Shack, Inc. opening brief due 06/08/2020. Appellee Bank of America, N.A. answering brief due 07/07/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11656060] (JBS) [Entered: 04/09/2020 09:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
