Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD, HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON SA, SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., HITACHI ASIA, LTD., SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V., PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA., TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA., PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED, HITACHI, LTD., MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., HITACHI AMERICA, LTD and TECHNOLOGIES DISPLAYS AMERICAS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Case Number: 20-15704
Filed: April 17, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2022 Filing 90 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 21-1218 Filed on: 03/04/2022 Cert Petition Action 1: Denied, 06/13/2022 [12469896] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081, 20-16685, 20-16686, 20-16691, 20-16699] (QDL) [Entered: 06/13/2022 01:52 PM]
March 10, 2022 Filing 89 MANDATE ISSUED.(WAF, RRC and GSK) Costs taxed against Appellants in the amount of $319.90 & in the amunt of $365.70. [12391230] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (NAC) [Entered: 03/10/2022 08:59 AM]
March 9, 2022 Filing 88 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 21-1218 Filed on: 03/04/2022 Cert Petition Action 1: Pending [12390903] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081, 20-16685, 20-16686, 20-16691, 20-16699] (RR) [Entered: 03/09/2022 03:54 PM]
March 2, 2022 Filing 87 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GARY S. KATZMANN) Appellants Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Rehearing En Banc (Docket Entry No. [ # 86 ]), which the panel construes as a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, is denied. Judge Fletcher, Judge Clifton, and Judge Katzmann recommend denying the petition. The full court has been advised of the motion for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The motion for rehearing and motion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. [12383958] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (OC) [Entered: 03/02/2022 09:41 AM]
October 6, 2021 Filing 86 Filed (ECF) Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697 petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (from 09/22/2021 memorandum). Date of service: 10/06/2021. [12250078] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 10/06/2021 05:13 PM]
October 6, 2021 Filing 85 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081 bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of $365.70 USD. Date of service: 10/06/2021 [12249671] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 10/06/2021 02:46 PM]
October 5, 2021 Filing 84 Filed (ECF) Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081 bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of $319.90 USD. Date of service: 10/05/2021 [12248467] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 10/05/2021 04:13 PM]
September 22, 2021 Filing 83 FILED MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GARY S. KATZMANN) Costs to be taxed against Appellants. AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12235542] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081, 20-16685, 20-16686, 20-16691, 20-16699] (MM) [Entered: 09/22/2021 10:17 AM]
July 28, 2021 Filing 82 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GARY S. KATZMANN. [12185819] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (ORW) [Entered: 07/28/2021 02:45 PM]
July 22, 2021 Filing 81 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mario Alioto for Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. Hearing in San Francisco on 07/28/2021 at 1:00 P.M. (Courtroom: 3). Filer sharing argument time: Yes. (Argument minutes: 3.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 07/22/2021. [12179960] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Alioto, Mario) [Entered: 07/22/2021 10:57 AM]
July 21, 2021 Filing 80 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Robert J. Bonsignore, Esquire for Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell in 20-16081. Hearing in San Francisco on 07/28/2021 at 1:00 P.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor Rm 307, James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, San Francisco). Filer sharing argument time: Yes. (Argument minutes: 5.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 07/21/2021. [12179330] [20-16081, 20-15697, 20-15704] (Bonsignore, Robert) [Entered: 07/21/2021 04:08 PM]
July 21, 2021 Filing 79 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tyler Ayres in 20-15697 Correspondence: letter re oral argument. Date of service: 07/21/2021 [12179023] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 07/21/2021 02:04 PM]
July 21, 2021 Filing 78 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. John Granville Crabtree, Sr. for Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697. Hearing in San Francisco on 07/28/2021 at 1:00 P.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 3). Filer sharing argument time: Yes. (Argument minutes: 10.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 07/21/2021. [12178501] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 07/21/2021 09:22 AM]
July 20, 2021 Filing 77 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081 Correspondence: Letter from Mario N. Alioto responding to Appellants' July 19, 2021 letter re: oral argument. Date of service: 07/20/2021 [12178264] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 07/20/2021 04:44 PM]
July 20, 2021 Filing 76 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Andrew Rhys Davies for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-15697, Attorney Mr. Andrew Rhys Davies for Appellees Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-15704, 20-16081. Hearing in San Francisco on 07/28/2021 at 1:00 P.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 3). Filer sharing argument time: Yes. (Argument minutes: 12.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 07/20/2021. [12177756] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 07/20/2021 12:01 PM]
July 20, 2021 Filing 75 Added Attorney(s) Sofia Arguello for party(s) Appellee Panasonic Corporation Appellee Panasonic Corporation of North America Appellee MT Picture Display Co., LTD, in case 20-15704, 20-15697, and 20-16081. [12177208] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (NAC) [Entered: 07/20/2021 07:10 AM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 74 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sofia Roa Arguello (Winston & Strawn LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166) for Appellees MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. Date of service: 07/19/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12177165] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Arguello, Sofia) [Entered: 07/19/2021 07:34 PM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 73 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tyler Ayres in 20-15697 Correspondence: Scheduling oral argument. Date of service: 07/19/2021 [12175967] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 07/19/2021 10:54 AM]
July 15, 2021 Filing 72 Notice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, July 28, 2021 - 1:00 P.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument will be held with all attorneys appearing remotely by video or telephone. The court strongly prefers video arguments whenever possible. Travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Wednesday, July 28, 2021. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12174050]. [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081]--[Edited 07/15/2021 by KS]--[Edited 07/15/2021 by KS] (KS) [Entered: 07/15/2021 05:08 PM]
July 15, 2021 Filing 71 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: OC):Oral argument will be held at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time on Wednesday, July 28, 2021. All parties, as well as the judges, will appear for argument by video. Each side will have 15 minutes of argument time. [12174045] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (OC) [Entered: 07/15/2021 05:03 PM]
May 18, 2021 Filing 70 Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell in 20-16081 Correspondence: To Clerk regarding oral argument. Date of service: 05/18/2021 [12116659] [20-16081, 20-15697, 20-15704] (Bonsignore, Robert) [Entered: 05/18/2021 12:11 PM]
May 14, 2021 Filing 69 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081 Correspondence: Letter to Clerk from Mario N. Alioto. Date of service: 05/14/2021 [12113949] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 05/14/2021 03:54 PM]
May 12, 2021 Filing 68 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tyler Ayres in 20-15697 Correspondence: Regarding oral argument. Date of service: 05/12/2021 [12110792] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 05/12/2021 02:22 PM]
April 30, 2021 Filing 67 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081 Correspondence: Letter to Clerk from Mario N. Alioto. Date of service: 04/30/2021 [12099016] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 04/30/2021 06:59 PM]
January 7, 2021 Filing 66 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 62 ] filed by Warren Cutlip, et el. (sent to panel) [11955975] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SD) [Entered: 01/07/2021 02:31 PM]
January 6, 2021 Filing 65 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 61 ] filed by Tyler Ayres, et al. (sent to panel) [11954572] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SD) [Entered: 01/06/2021 02:25 PM]
December 31, 2020 Filing 64 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 62 ] submitted by Warren Cutlip, et al. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11949408] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (KWG) [Entered: 12/31/2020 08:55 AM]
December 31, 2020 Filing 63 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 61 ] submitted by Tyler Ayres, et al. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11949405] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (KWG) [Entered: 12/31/2020 08:52 AM]
December 30, 2020 Filing 62 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell in 20-16081. Date of service: 12/30/2020. [11949314] [20-16081, 20-15697, 20-15704] (Bonsignore, Robert) [Entered: 12/30/2020 09:38 PM]
December 30, 2020 Filing 61 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697. Date of service: 12/30/2020. [11949276] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 12/30/2020 05:39 PM]
December 2, 2020 Filing 60 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: OC): Pursuant to G.O. 3.2(h), Judge W. Fletcher has been drawn to replace Judge Wardlaw, who is recused. The reconstituted panel: W. FLETCHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and KATZMANN,* Judge, will retain jurisdiction of this case. [11913047] [17-15496, 17-15597, 17-15598, 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081, 20-16699, 20-16685, 20-16684, 20-16686, 20-16691] (OC) [Entered: 12/02/2020 04:01 PM]
November 17, 2020 Filing 59 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 51 ] filed by Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. (sent to panel) [11896468] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SD) [Entered: 11/17/2020 03:43 PM]
November 17, 2020 Filing 58 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 52 ] in 4 volume(s) filed by Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. (sent to panel) [11896197] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (KWG) [Entered: 11/17/2020 02:51 PM]
November 17, 2020 Filing 57 Streamlined request [56] by Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697 to extend time to file the brief is approved for ALL APPELLANTS. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 12/30/2020 . [11895812] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (JN) [Entered: 11/17/2020 12:10 PM]
November 17, 2020 Filing 56 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697. New requested due date is 12/30/2020. [11895238] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 11/17/2020 08:35 AM]
November 12, 2020 Filing 55 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 49 ] in 2 volume(s) filed by Appellees Toshiba Corporation, et al. (sent to panel) [11892485] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (LA) [Entered: 11/13/2020 01:57 PM]
November 12, 2020 Filing 54 Received 7 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 48 ] filed by Appellees. (sent to panel) [11891185] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SD) [Entered: 11/12/2020 04:35 PM]
November 10, 2020 Filing 53 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 51 ] submitted by Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 52 ] submitted by Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11888610] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SML) [Entered: 11/10/2020 02:11 PM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 52 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. Date of service: 11/09/2020. [11887525] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 11/09/2020 11:08 PM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 51 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. Date of service: 11/09/2020. [11887523] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 11/09/2020 10:48 PM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 50 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 48 ] submitted by appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 49 ] submitted by appellees are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11886959] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SML) [Entered: 11/09/2020 03:14 PM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 49 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellees Hitachi America, Ltd, Hitachi Asia, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Philips do Brasil Ltda., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Koninklijke N.V., Philips Taiwan Limited, Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Technologies Displays Americas LLC, Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Thomson SA, Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. Date of service: 11/09/2020. [11886761] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081]--[COURT UPDATE: Removed incorrect filer of the excerpts. 11/10/2020 by SML] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 11/09/2020 02:24 PM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 48 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Hitachi America, Ltd, Hitachi Asia, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Philips do Brasil Ltda., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Koninklijke N.V., Philips Taiwan Limited, Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Technologies Displays Americas LLC, Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Thomson SA, Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. Date of service: 11/09/2020. [11886667] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 11/09/2020 01:53 PM]
October 8, 2020 Filing 47 Added Attorney Donald Arthur Wall for Appellee Technologies Displays Americas LLC, in cases 20-15697, 20-15704 and 20-16081. [11853110] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (HH) [Entered: 10/08/2020 04:25 PM]
October 8, 2020 Filing 46 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Donald A. Wall (Squire Patton Boggs LLP, 1 E. Washington Street, Suite 2700, Phoenix, AZ 85004) for Appellee Technologies Displays Americas LLC in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. Date of service: 10/08/2020. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [11853086] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Wall, Donald) [Entered: 10/08/2020 04:20 PM]
October 8, 2020 Filing 45 Entered appearance of Appellee Technologies Displays Americas LLC in 20-15697, Appellee Technologies Displays Americas LLC in 20-15704 and Appellee Technologies Displays Americas LLC in 20-16081. [11852770] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (TYL) [Entered: 10/08/2020 03:03 PM]
September 23, 2020 Filing 44 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 36 ] in 9 volume(s) filed by Appellants Warren Cutlip, et al. (sent to panel) [11834660] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (LA) [Entered: 09/23/2020 02:47 PM]
September 23, 2020 Filing 43 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 35 ] filed by Warren Cutlip; et al. (sent to panel) [11834411] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (DB) [Entered: 09/23/2020 01:34 PM]
September 17, 2020 Filing 42 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 33 ] filed by Tyler Ayres; et al. (sent to panel). [11828446] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (DB) [Entered: 09/17/2020 05:46 PM]
September 16, 2020 Filing 41 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 34 ] in 9 volume(s) filed by Appellants Tyler Ayres, et al. and Appellant Eleanor Lewis. (sent to panel) [11826616] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (LA) [Entered: 09/16/2020 03:11 PM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 40 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 35 ] submitted by Warren Cutlip; et al., is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 36 ] submitted by Warren Cutlip; et al., are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11822469] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SML) [Entered: 09/14/2020 11:28 AM]
September 9, 2020 Filing 39 Streamlined request [37] by Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-15697, 20-15704, Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-16081 to extend time to file the brief is approved for all Appellees. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees Hitachi America, Ltd, Hitachi Asia, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Koninklijke N.V., Philips Taiwan Limited, Philips do Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Thomson SA, Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation answering briefs due 11/09/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering briefs. [11817479] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (JN) [Entered: 09/09/2020 11:41 AM]
September 9, 2020 Filing 38 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 33 ] submitted by Tyler Ayres; et al., is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 34 ] submitted by Tyler Ayres; et al., are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11817286] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (SML) [Entered: 09/09/2020 10:26 AM]
September 9, 2020 Filing 37 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081. New requested due date is 11/09/2020. [11817212] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 09/09/2020 10:01 AM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 36 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell in 20-16081. Date of service: 09/08/2020. [11816852] [20-16081, 20-15697, 20-15704]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 09/14/2020 by SML] (Bonsignore, Robert) [Entered: 09/08/2020 10:00 PM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 35 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell in 20-16081. Date of service: 09/08/2020. [11816848] [20-16081, 20-15697, 20-15704] (Bonsignore, Robert) [Entered: 09/08/2020 09:32 PM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 34 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697, Appellant Eleanor Lewis in 20-15704. Date of service: 09/08/2020. [11816827] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 09/08/2020 08:05 PM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 33 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697, Appellant Eleanor Lewis in 20-15704. Date of service: 09/08/2020. [11816820] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 09/08/2020 07:50 PM]
August 11, 2020 Filing 32 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GARY S. KATZMANN) The stipulated motion to consolidate Appeal No. 20-16081 with Appeals Nos. 20-15697 and 20-15704 is GRANTED. The following briefing schedule shall govern these consolidated cases: The opening briefs are due September 8, 2020. The answering briefs are due October 8, 2020. The optional reply briefs are due within 21 days after service of the last-served answering brief. All parties on a side are encouraged to join in a single brief to the extent practicable. IT IS SO ORDERED. [11785409] [20-15697, 20-15704, 20-16081] (OC) [Entered: 08/11/2020 03:15 PM]
August 7, 2020 Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-15697, 20-15704 Stipulated Motion to consolidate cases 20-15697, 20-15704, and 20-16081. Date of service: 08/07/2020. [11781566] [20-15697, 20-15704] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 08/07/2020 02:46 PM]
July 27, 2020 Filing 30 Streamlined request [29], [28] by Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697, Appellant Eleanor Lewis in 20-15704 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamlined requests allow for a 30 day extension of time to file the brief. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants opening brief due 08/24/2020. Appellees Hitachi America, Ltd, Hitachi Asia, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Koninklijke N.V., Philips Taiwan Limited, Philips do Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Thomson SA, Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation consoidated answering brief due 09/23/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11767703] [20-15697, 20-15704] (JN) [Entered: 07/27/2020 03:00 PM]
July 24, 2020 Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Eleanor Lewis in 20-15704. New requested due date is 08/07/2020. [11765622] [20-15704, 20-15697] (Kirkham, Tracy) [Entered: 07/24/2020 03:20 PM]
July 24, 2020 Filing 28 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Tyler Ayres, Mike Bratcher, Nikki Crawley, Jay Erickson, Harry Garavanian, John Heenan, Hope Hitchcock, D. Bruce Johnson, Jeff Johnson, Kerry Murphy, Chris Seufert, Robert Stephenson, Gary Talewsky and William Trentham in 20-15697. New requested due date is 08/07/2020. [11764908] [20-15697, 20-15704] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 07/24/2020 10:10 AM]
July 22, 2020 Filing 27 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GARY S. KATZMANN) Appellants emergency motion for a stay pending appeal is DENIED. Appellants have not shown that they are likely to suffer irreparable injury in the absence of a stay. Al Otro Lado v. Wolf, 952 F.3d 999, 1007 (9th Cir. 2020). The temporary administrative stay of the district courts order granting final approval of the class settlement is lifted. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. [11762087] [20-15697, 20-15704] (OC) [Entered: 07/22/2020 01:07 PM]
July 20, 2020 Filing 26 Filed (ECF) Appellant Eleanor Lewis in 20-15704 reply to response (). Date of service: 07/20/2020. [11759665] [20-15704, 20-15697] (Kirkham, Tracy) [Entered: 07/20/2020 06:43 PM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 25 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15704, 20-15697 response to motion ([ # 20 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 20 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 07/17/2020. [11757833] [20-15704, 20-15697] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 07/17/2020 09:51 PM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in 20-15697, 20-15704 response opposing motion ([ # 20 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 20 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to stay lower court action). Date of service: 07/17/2020. [11757800] [20-15697, 20-15704] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 07/17/2020 06:19 PM]
July 14, 2020 Filing 23 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GARY S. KATZMANN) We have received Appellants emergency motions for a stay pending appeal. The district courts order granting final approval of the class settlement between the IPP Plaintiffs and the settling Defendants (District Ct. Dkt. 5786) is temporarily stayed pending the resolution of the emergency motions. Appellees are ordered to file a response to the emergency motions no later than July 17, 2020. Any reply must be filed no later than July 20, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. [11752513] [20-15697, 20-15704] (OC) [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:08 PM]
July 14, 2020 Filing 22 Added Attorney(s) Christopher Thomas Micheletti for party(s) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, in case 20-15704 Attorney(s) Christopher Thomas Micheletti for party(s) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, in case 20-15697. [11752341] [20-15697, 20-15704] (NAC) [Entered: 07/14/2020 11:55 AM]
July 14, 2020 Filing 21 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher T. Micheletti (Zelle LLP, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400, San Francisco, CA 94104) for Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 20-15697, 20-15704. Date of service: 07/14/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11752331] [20-15697, 20-15704] (Micheletti, Christopher) [Entered: 07/14/2020 11:53 AM]
July 9, 2020 Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Appellant Eleanor Lewis in 20-15704 EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 07/09/2020. [11748125] [20-15704, 20-15697] (Kirkham, Tracy) [Entered: 07/09/2020 09:07 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 19 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): The following briefing schedule shall govern these consolidated cases: The opening briefs are due July 24, 2020. The consolidated answering briefs are due August 24, 2020. The optional reply briefs are due within 21 days after service of the last-served consolidated answering brief. All parties on a side are encouraged to join in a single brief to the extent practicable. [11729488] [20-15697, 20-15704] (AF) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:30 PM]
June 9, 2020 Filing 18 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GARY S. KATZMANN) Appellants appeal the district courts orders (1) denying their motions to intervene and (2) granting preliminary approval of a class settlement between the so-called Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (Appellees) and some of the defendants in this case. Appellees do not dispute our jurisdiction to review the orders denying intervention. See Prete v. Bradbury, 438 F.3d 949, 959 n.14 (9th Cir. 2006). But they move to dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction to the extent they challenge the order granting preliminary approval of the settlement. Appellants advance two arguments in favor of appellate jurisdiction over the order granting preliminary approval. First, they contend that the orders denying their motions to intervene were final judgments as to them, and that the preliminary approval order merged into those judgments such that it too is subject to immediate review. However, orders denying motions to intervene are immediately appealable not as final judgments but instead under the collateral order doctrine. Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of Maui, 842 F.3d 681, 688 (9th Cir. 2016)....In sum, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review the district courts order granting preliminary approval of the class settlement. Accordingly, Appellees motions to partially dismiss the appeals are GRANTED. These appeals shall be consolidated for future proceedings. The Clerk is directed to set a briefing schedule for the merits of the remaining issues. The parties are encouraged to submit combined briefs to the extent practicable. IT IS SO ORDERED. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [11716114] [20-15697, 20-15704] (OC) [Entered: 06/09/2020 02:00 PM]
May 26, 2020 Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs reply to response (). Date of service: 05/26/2020. [11701797] [20-15704] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 05/26/2020 11:49 PM]
May 18, 2020 Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Appellant Eleanor Lewis response to motion ([ # 14 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 14 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction). Date of service: 05/18/2020. [11694755] [20-15704] (Bogdanov, John) [Entered: 05/18/2020 11:17 PM]
May 18, 2020 Filing 15 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: These cases are RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding these appeals, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11693901] [20-15697, 20-15704] (VS) [Entered: 05/18/2020 01:09 PM]
May 8, 2020 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 05/08/2020. [11685727] [20-15704] (Capurro, Lauren) [Entered: 05/08/2020 06:53 PM]
April 28, 2020 Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 05/12/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedules remain in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11674557] [20-15697, 20-15704] (VS) [Entered: 04/28/2020 01:54 PM]
April 27, 2020 Filing 12 Added Attorney(s) James Sigel for party(s) Appellee Hitachi Asia, Ltd. Appellee Hitachi, Ltd. Appellee Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. Appellee Hitachi America, Ltd Appellee Hitachi Displays, Ltd., in case 20-15704. [11671945] (CW) [Entered: 04/27/2020 07:18 AM]
April 27, 2020 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of James R. Sigel (Morrison & Foerster LLP, 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105) for Appellees Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd, Hitachi Asia, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.. Date of service: 04/27/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11671933] [20-15704] (Sigel, James) [Entered: 04/27/2020 07:07 AM]
April 24, 2020 Filing 10 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/24/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11671629]. [20-15704] (AD) [Entered: 04/24/2020 06:44 PM]
April 24, 2020 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Eleanor Lewis Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/24/2020. [11671180] [20-15704] (Kirkham, Tracy) [Entered: 04/24/2020 01:53 PM]
April 23, 2020 Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Matthew Frutig for party(s) Appellee Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC Appellee Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. Appellee Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. Appellee Toshiba America, Inc., in case 20-15704. [11670057] (CW) [Entered: 04/23/2020 03:00 PM]
April 23, 2020 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew Frutig (White & Case LLP 701 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, District of Columbia 20005-3807) for Appellees Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.. Date of service: 04/23/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11669874] [20-15704] (Frutig, Matthew) [Entered: 04/23/2020 01:45 PM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 6 Terminated John Roberti for Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Thomson SA, Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Philips do Brasil Ltda., Philips Taiwan Limited, Philips Koninklijke N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Corporation, MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Asia, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd in 20-15704 [11667016] (CW) [Entered: 04/21/2020 10:44 AM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) John Roberti for party(s) Appellee Hitachi Asia, Ltd. Appellee Panasonic Corporation of North America Appellee Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC Appellee Philips Koninklijke N.V. Appellee MT Picture Display Co., LTD Appellee Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda. Appellee Samsung SDI America, Inc. Appellee Toshiba America, Inc. Appellee Hitachi Displays, Ltd. Appellee Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. Appellee Hitachi, Ltd. Appellee Philips Electronics North America Corporation Appellee Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD Appellee Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. Appellee Thomson SA Appellee Panasonic Corporation Appellee Philips Taiwan Limited Appellee Toshiba Corporation Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs Appellee Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. Appellee Philips do Brasil Ltda. Appellee Hitachi America, Ltd Appellee Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. Appellee Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. Appellee Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. Appellee Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V. Appellee Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., in case 20-15704. [11666881] (CW) [Entered: 04/21/2020 09:43 AM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John Roberti (Allen & Overy LLP, 1101 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005) for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.. Substitution for Gary Halling, Esquire for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., James McGinnis for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Michael W. Scarborough for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.. Date of service: 04/21/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11666866] [20-15704] (Roberti, John) [Entered: 04/21/2020 09:40 AM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 3 Attorneys Gary Halling, Gary Halling, Gary Halling, Gary Halling, Gary Halling, Gary Halling and Gary Halling in 20-15704 substituted by Attorneys Andrew Rhys Davies, Andrew Rhys Davies, Andrew Rhys Davies, Andrew Rhys Davies, Andrew Rhys Davies, Andrew Rhys Davies and Andrew Rhys Davies in 20-15704 [11666860] (CW) [Entered: 04/21/2020 09:38 AM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew Rhys Davies (Allen & Overy LLP, 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020) for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.. Substitution for Gary Halling, Esquire for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., James McGinnis for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Michael W. Scarborough for Appellees Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.. Date of service: 04/21/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11666840] [20-15704] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 04/21/2020 09:30 AM]
April 17, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eleanor Lewis Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/24/2020. Transcript ordered by 05/15/2020. Transcript due 06/15/2020. Appellant Eleanor Lewis opening brief due 07/24/2020. Appellees Hitachi America, Ltd, Hitachi Asia, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Koninklijke N.V., Philips Taiwan Limited, Philips do Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Thomson SA, Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation answering brief due 08/24/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11664590] (RT) [Entered: 04/17/2020 01:54 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC
Represented By: Matthew Frutig
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Lucius B. Lau
Represented By: Dana Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
Represented By: Martin C. Geagan
Represented By: Molly M. Donovan
Represented By: Kevin B. Goldstein Esquire
Represented By: David Yohai Esquire
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Kessler
Represented By: Adam C. Hemlock
Represented By: Eva W. Cole
Represented By: Aldo Badini
Represented By: David Yolkut
Represented By: Sofia Arguello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD
Represented By: John Roberti
Represented By: Michael W. Scarborough
Represented By: James McGinnis
Represented By: Andrew Rhys Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.
Represented By: Eliot A. Adelson Esquire
Represented By: James Sigel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Represented By: Ryan Hurley
Represented By: Kathy Osborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Represented By: Erik T. Koons
Represented By: John M. Taladay Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
Represented By: John Roberti
Represented By: Michael W. Scarborough
Represented By: James McGinnis
Represented By: Andrew Rhys Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Lucius B. Lau
Represented By: Dana Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: John Roberti
Represented By: Michael W. Scarborough
Represented By: James McGinnis
Represented By: Andrew Rhys Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
Represented By: John Roberti
Represented By: Michael W. Scarborough
Represented By: James McGinnis
Represented By: Andrew Rhys Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMSON SA
Represented By: Ryan Hurley
Represented By: Kathy Osborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
Represented By: John Roberti
Represented By: Michael W. Scarborough
Represented By: James McGinnis
Represented By: Andrew Rhys Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.
Represented By: Eliot A. Adelson Esquire
Represented By: James Sigel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity
Represented By: Molly M. Donovan
Represented By: Kevin B. Goldstein Esquire
Represented By: David Yohai Esquire
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Kessler
Represented By: Adam C. Hemlock
Represented By: Eva W. Cole
Represented By: Aldo Badini
Represented By: David Yolkut
Represented By: Sofia Arguello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Represented By: Matthew Frutig
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Lucius B. Lau
Represented By: Dana Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI ASIA, LTD.
Represented By: Eliot A. Adelson Esquire
Represented By: James Sigel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.
Represented By: John Roberti
Represented By: Michael W. Scarborough
Represented By: James McGinnis
Represented By: Andrew Rhys Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.
Represented By: Erik T. Koons
Represented By: John M. Taladay Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.
Represented By: Matthew Frutig
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Lucius B. Lau
Represented By: Dana Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.
Represented By: Erik T. Koons
Represented By: John M. Taladay Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.
Represented By: John Roberti
Represented By: Michael W. Scarborough
Represented By: James McGinnis
Represented By: Andrew Rhys Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED
Represented By: Erik T. Koons
Represented By: John M. Taladay Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI, LTD.
Represented By: Eliot A. Adelson Esquire
Represented By: James Sigel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD
Represented By: Martin C. Geagan
Represented By: Molly M. Donovan
Represented By: Kevin B. Goldstein Esquire
Represented By: David Yohai Esquire
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Kessler
Represented By: Adam C. Hemlock
Represented By: Eva W. Cole
Represented By: Aldo Badini
Represented By: David Yolkut
Represented By: Sofia Arguello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Matthew Frutig
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Lucius B. Lau
Represented By: Dana Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI AMERICA, LTD
Represented By: Eliot A. Adelson Esquire
Represented By: James Sigel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TECHNOLOGIES DISPLAYS AMERICAS LLC
Represented By: Donald Arthur Wall Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Represented By: Mario Alioto
Represented By: Sylvie Kern
Represented By: Jennifer S. Rosenberg Esquire
Represented By: Lauren C. Capurro
Represented By: Daniel Edward Birkhaeuser Esquire
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Micheletti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Represented By: John Bogdanov
Represented By: Tracy Rena Kirkham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?