Darryl Pugh v. P. Lam, et al
STEVEN THARRAT |
P. LAM, M.D., T. FRIEDRICHS, M.D. and YULANDA MYNHIER, Director of Health Care Policy and Administration |
DARRYL PUGH |
20-15736 |
April 21, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: th): Granting Appellant's Motion [ # 5 ] to extend time to file opening brief. Appellant Darryl Pugh opening brief due 07/13/2020. Appellees T. Friedrichs, P. Lam and Yulanda Mynhier answering brief due 08/12/2020 The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11701484] (TH) [Entered: 05/26/2020 04:43 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Darryl Pugh motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief. Deficiencies: None. [11692453] (JFF) [Entered: 05/15/2020 01:42 PM] |
Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11688990] (CKP) [Entered: 05/13/2020 06:59 AM] |
Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 05/10/2020. [Case Number 20-15736: Partially Paid] [11686997] (CW) [Entered: 05/11/2020 03:43 PM] |
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11669702] (CKP) [Entered: 04/23/2020 12:05 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Darryl Pugh opening brief due 06/12/2020. Appellees T. Friedrichs, P. Lam and Yulanda Mynhier answering brief due 07/13/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11667235] (JPD) [Entered: 04/21/2020 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.