Nateel Sharma v. M. Spearman
| M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden |
| NATEEL SHARMA |
| 20-15739 |
| April 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MF) This appeal is dismissed as duplicative of appeal No. 20-15408. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11675827] (WL) [Entered: 04/29/2020 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11667408] (RT) [Entered: 04/21/2020 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Nateel Sharma v. M. Spearman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Gregg E. Zywicke Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: NATEEL SHARMA | |
| Represented By: | Nateel Sharma |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
