Carl Davis v. David Shinn
| DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, Dept of Correction, State of Arizona |
| CARL DWIGHT DAVIS |
| 20-15790 |
| April 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Received Appellant Carl Dwight Davis supplemental memorandum in support of motion for appointment of counsel. [11713924] (NAC) [Entered: 06/08/2020 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 12 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/04/2020. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Transcript of Proceeding (Doc. 19 ) is denied [11711470] (NAC) [Entered: 06/04/2020 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 11 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request filed on 06/03/2020. [11709604] (JR) [Entered: 06/03/2020 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 10 Received Appellant Carl Dwight Davis request for copy of rules. [11709551] (NAC) [Entered: 06/03/2020 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MN): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) is denied as unnecessary. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of appellants motion for appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. The motion for appointment of counsel will be addressed by separate order. [11706338] (RY) [Entered: 06/01/2020 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 8 Sent Appellant a copy of docket entry number one is response to his letter of request filed on 04/30/2020. [11706209] (JR) [Entered: 06/01/2020 08:31 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Carl Dwight Davis motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief. Deficiencies: None [11703533] (NAC) [Entered: 05/28/2020 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 6 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11689564] (CKP) [Entered: 05/13/2020 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Carl Dwight Davis motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11687486] (NAC) [Entered: 05/12/2020 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received Appellant Carl Dwight Davis certificate of service. [11682147] (NAC) [Entered: 05/06/2020 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Carl Dwight Davis motion requesting missing Court of Appeals documents. Deficiencies: None. [11676930] (NAC) [Entered: 04/30/2020 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11675613] (CKP) [Entered: 04/29/2020 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Carl Dwight Davis opening brief due 06/23/2020. [11672366] (JMR) [Entered: 04/27/2020 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Carl Davis v. David Shinn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, Dept of Correction, State of Arizona | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: CARL DWIGHT DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | Carl Dwight Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
