Gradetech, Inc., et al v. City of San Jose, et al
Defendant: CITY OF SAN JOSE, a public entity
Plaintiff / Appellee: GRADETECH, INC., a California corporation and SAM RIVINIUS, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW CANO, in his individual capacity, MATTHEW LOESCH, in his individual capacity, CHRIS MASTRODICASA, in his individual capacity, DAVID FRENCH, in his individual capacity and JIM ORTBAL, as an individual and in his official capacity as the City's Hearing Officer on Gradetech's protest of the City's 2019 Minor Street Projects disqualification decision
Case Number: 20-15812
Filed: April 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 16, 2021 GRADETECH, INC. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2020 Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11704176] (CL) [Entered: 05/28/2020 02:55 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/06/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11683035]. [20-15812] (AD) [Entered: 05/06/2020 06:44 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees Gradetech, Inc. and Sam Rivinius Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/06/2020. [11682981] [20-15812] (Parkhurst, Andrew) [Entered: 05/06/2020 05:15 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Andrew Parkhurst for party(s) Appellee Gradetech, Inc. Appellee Sam Rivinius, in case 20-15812. [11682944] (CW) [Entered: 05/06/2020 04:52 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew Keith Parkhurst (McManis Faulkner, 50 W. San Fernando Street, 10th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113) for Appellees Gradetech, Inc. and Sam Rivinius. Date of service: 05/06/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11682942] [20-15812] (Parkhurst, Andrew) [Entered: 05/06/2020 04:49 PM]
May 6, 2020 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/27/2020, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11682686] (CL) [Entered: 05/06/2020 02:18 PM]
May 1, 2020 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/01/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11678594]. [20-15812] (AD) [Entered: 05/01/2020 06:44 PM]
May 1, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Matthew Cano, David French, Matthew Loesch, Chris Mastrodicasa and Jim Ortbal Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/01/2020. [11678215] [20-15812] (Pritchard, Matthew) [Entered: 05/01/2020 02:28 PM]
April 29, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Matthew Cano, David French, Matthew Loesch, Chris Mastrodicasa and Jim Ortbal Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/06/2020. Transcript ordered by 05/28/2020. Transcript due 06/29/2020. Appellants Matthew Cano, David French, Matthew Loesch, Chris Mastrodicasa and Jim Ortbal opening brief due 08/06/2020. Appellees Gradetech, Inc. and Sam Rivinius answering brief due 09/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11675385] (JBS) [Entered: 04/29/2020 10:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gradetech, Inc., et al v. City of San Jose, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: GRADETECH, INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Tyler Atkinson
Represented By: James McManis
Represented By: Matthew Schechter
Represented By: Andrew Parkhurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: SAM RIVINIUS, an individual
Represented By: Tyler Atkinson
Represented By: James McManis
Represented By: Matthew Schechter
Represented By: Andrew Parkhurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: MATTHEW CANO, in his individual capacity
Represented By: Nora Valerie Frimann
Represented By: Matthew Wade Pritchard Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: MATTHEW LOESCH, in his individual capacity
Represented By: Nora Valerie Frimann
Represented By: Matthew Wade Pritchard Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CHRIS MASTRODICASA, in his individual capacity
Represented By: Nora Valerie Frimann
Represented By: Matthew Wade Pritchard Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DAVID FRENCH, in his individual capacity
Represented By: Nora Valerie Frimann
Represented By: Matthew Wade Pritchard Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JIM ORTBAL, as an individual and in his official capacity as the City's Hearing Officer on Gradetech's protest of the City's 2019 Minor Street Projects disqualification decision
Represented By: Nora Valerie Frimann
Represented By: Matthew Wade Pritchard Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF SAN JOSE, a public entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?