Jose Rivas Rosales, et al v. William Barr, et al
| JAMES MCHENRY and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| JOSE GABRIEL RIVAS ROSALES, E R.R. and REYNA ESMERALDA ROMERO LOPEZ |
| 20-15813 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: EU): Updated deadlines. Automatic 60-day extension (notice filed at Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]). Appellants E R.R., Jose Gabriel Rivas Rosales and Reyna Esmeralda Romero Lopez opening brief due 08/25/2020. Appellees William P. Barr, Attorney General and James McHenry answering brief due 09/24/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11724357] (EU) [Entered: 06/17/2020 08:01 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellants E R.R., Jose Gabriel Rivas Rosales and Reyna Esmeralda Romero Lopez Correspondence: The court is notified that due to logistical issues related to the COVID-19 virus, PETITIONERS require a 60-day extension of time to file the OPENING BRIEF, currently due on June 26, 2020.. Date of service: 06/16/2020 [11724093] [20-15813] (Jagannath, Gautam) [Entered: 06/16/2020 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11713334] (CL) [Entered: 06/05/2020 08:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 06/01/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11694403] (CL) [Entered: 05/18/2020 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/11/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11686489]. [20-15813] (AD) [Entered: 05/11/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants E R.R., Jose Gabriel Rivas Rosales and Reyna Esmeralda Romero Lopez Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/11/2020. [11686137] [20-15813] (Jagannath, Gautam) [Entered: 05/11/2020 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [11685076] (LW) [Entered: 05/08/2020 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants E R.R., Jose Gabriel Rivas Rosales and Reyna Esmeralda Romero Lopez Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/06/2020. Appellants E R.R., Jose Gabriel Rivas Rosales and Reyna Esmeralda Romero Lopez opening brief due 06/26/2020. Appellees William P. Barr, Attorney General and James McHenry answering brief due 07/27/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11675424] (JBS) [Entered: 04/29/2020 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
