Kenneth Griffin v. J. Clark Kelso, et al
| SEPULVEDA, Dr., A. MASURET, J. CLARK KELSO, D. BRIGHT, Dr., D. POMPAN, Dr., J. RHOADS and T. WOODS |
| KENNETH A. GRIFFIN |
| SAHOTA, Dr., J. BAL, A. NANGALAMA, Dr. and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION |
| 20-15841 |
| May 4, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KENNETH GRIFFIN V. J. CLARK KELSO |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion [ # 9 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellant Kenneth A. Griffin; Appellant Kenneth A. Griffin opening brief due 09/14/2020. Appellees J. Bal, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Nangalama and Sahota answering brief due 10/14/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11739719] (GS) [Entered: 07/01/2020 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth A. Griffin Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 09/14/2020. Date of service: 06/29/2020. [11735797] [20-15841] (Ikonte, Chijioke) [Entered: 06/29/2020 01:43 AM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN FurtherConference, 06/17/2020, 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time w/ counsel for appellant. See order for details. [11720215] (VS) [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 06/12/2020, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11694963] (VS) [Entered: 05/19/2020 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/12/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11688247]. [20-15841] (AD) [Entered: 05/12/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth A. Griffin Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/12/2020. [11688235] [20-15841] (Ikonte, Chijioke) [Entered: 05/12/2020 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KWH): On May 4, 2020, the district court granted appellants request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Accordingly, appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed before this court (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as unnecessary. The briefing schedule previously established remains in effect. [11687619] (WL) [Entered: 05/12/2020 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 05/04/2020. request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, ECF No. 147, is granted [11681228] (JFF) [Entered: 05/05/2020 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Kenneth A. Griffin motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/30/2020. [11679325] (JPD) [Entered: 05/04/2020 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kenneth A. Griffin Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/11/2020. Appellant Kenneth A. Griffin opening brief due 06/29/2020. Appellees J. Bal, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Nangalama and Sahota answering brief due 07/29/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11679250] (JPD) [Entered: 05/04/2020 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
