Curtis Downing v. Jo Gentry, et al
| BARBARA CEGAVSKE, ADAM LAXALT, T. HOCHMANN, E. RODRATE, SOLORIO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, S. DAS, CONTRERAS, JAMES DZURENDA and M. HUGHES |
| CURTIS L. DOWNING |
| GILLIAN LAMBEY, TIMOTHY KNATZ, RASHONDA SMITH, JOHN KING, BRIAN KERBY, ADAM BURNSIDE, JOSEPH KOBRICK, FRANK DREESEN, ANA LEOS, ELVIN WORTHEY, JO GENTRY, Warden and RAMA AKASH |
| 20-15857 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record and appellants response to the courts May 6, 2020 order to show cause demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the May 4, 2020 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts order entered on March 9, 2020. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). DISMISSED. [11731279] (OC) [Entered: 06/23/2020 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellee Curtis L. Downing letter dated 06/15/2020 re: Case status. Paper filing deficiency: None. (sent copy of docket sheet) [11726417] (RL) [Entered: 06/18/2020 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Rama Akash, Adam Burnside, Frank Dreesen, Jo Gentry, Brian Kerby, John King, Timothy Knatz, Joseph Kobrick, Gillian Lambey, Ana Leos, Rashonda Smith and Elvin Worthey response to Court order dated 05/06/2020. Date of service: 05/19/2020. [11695666] [20-15857] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the March 9, 2020 date of entry of the order challenged in the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11682516] (OC) [Entered: 05/06/2020 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Katlyn M. Brady substituted by Attorney Frank Anthony Toddre II. [11681382] (RL) [Entered: 05/05/2020 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Frank A. Toddre, II (Attorney General's Office, State of Nevada, 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101) for Appellants Rama Akash, Adam Burnside, Frank Dreesen, Jo Gentry, Brian Kerby, John King, Timothy Knatz, Joseph Kobrick, Gillian Lambey, Ana Leos, Rashonda Smith and Elvin Worthey. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Katlyn M. Brady, Esquire for Appellants Rama Akash, Adam Burnside, Frank Dreesen, Jo Gentry, Brian Kerby, John King, Timothy Knatz, Joseph Kobrick, Gillian Lambey, Ana Leos, Rashonda Smith and Elvin Worthey. Date of service: 05/05/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11681375] [20-15857] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 05/05/2020 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 06/03/2020. Transcript due 07/06/2020. Appellants Jo Gentry, et al., opening brief due 08/12/2020. Appellee Curtis L. Downing answering brief due 09/11/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11681293] (JPD) [Entered: 05/05/2020 02:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.