Richard Thompson v. Mike Infanzon, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD WAYNE THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee: JENNIFER ANNE ELCOCK, Senior Partner at Epic Policy Group, MIKE INFANZON, Managing Partner at Epic Policy Group, CARLOS BROWN, Attorney at Public Defender and ARANTXA BROWN, Legal Assistant at Carlos Brown Law
Case Number: 20-15878
Filed: May 7, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2020 Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): The court has received the district courts June 5, 2020 order confirming that appellant may proceed in forma pauperis for this appeal. Accordingly, this courts May 14, 2020 order is vacated. The Clerk shall update the docket to reflect appellants in forma pauperis status. The opening brief is due August 7, 2020. Because there is no appearance by appellees, briefing will be completed upon the filing of the opening brief. [11714378] (JMR) [Entered: 06/08/2020 01:34 PM]
June 5, 2020 Filing 7 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/05/2020. ORDER - The Court's May 11, 2020 Order is withdrawn and vacated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's May 20, 2020 Order is affirmed. The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal would be taken in good faith and finds Plaintiff may appeal in forma pauperis. [11712863] (QDL) [Entered: 06/05/2020 02:29 PM]
May 20, 2020 Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 05/20/2020. Order - The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and finds Plaintiff may appeal in forma pauperis. [11696730] (QDL) [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:00 PM]
May 14, 2020 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11691292] (CKP) [Entered: 05/14/2020 03:22 PM]
May 12, 2020 Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-15878: Due] ). [11688421] (CO) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:05 PM]
May 11, 2020 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 05/11/2020 revoking Plaintiffs IFP status. [11686996] (QDL) [Entered: 05/11/2020 03:43 PM]
May 8, 2020 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11685058] (CKP) [Entered: 05/08/2020 12:41 PM]
May 7, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Richard Wayne Thompson opening brief due 07/06/2020. [11683536] (JMR) [Entered: 05/07/2020 11:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richard Thompson v. Mike Infanzon, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD WAYNE THOMPSON
Represented By: Richard Wayne Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JENNIFER ANNE ELCOCK, Senior Partner at Epic Policy Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MIKE INFANZON, Managing Partner at Epic Policy Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CARLOS BROWN, Attorney at Public Defender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARANTXA BROWN, Legal Assistant at Carlos Brown Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?