Tony Pressler v. Dotty Casino and Employees, et al
KYLE JONES, DENNIS WILLIAMS, MYLER, LANA KILA BANNER, JANNA WEILER, M. LOCUSON, Sergeant, STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF INVESTIGATION, DEREK HOTLAND, ELKO POLICE DEPARTMENT AND EMPLOYEES, JACOB EISINGER, ROXY PETE, CHRISTOPHER W. GEVOCK, HARLEY, BRAIN DRAKE, MICHAEL MARSHOWSKY, CHELSEA WOTEN, ANTHONY MATTHEWS, DOTTY CASINO AND EMPLOYEES and JOSHUA TAYLOR |
TONY ALLEN PRESSLER |
20-15901 |
May 12, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, JHN and DPC) [11719568] (CW) [Entered: 06/12/2020 06:37 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and DANIEL PAUL COLLINS): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11698084] (AF) [Entered: 05/21/2020 01:56 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tony Allen Pressler opening brief due 07/06/2020. [11687622] (JPD) [Entered: 05/12/2020 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.