The Estate of Crysta Proctor, et al v. County of Pinal, et al
| JESSICA CLODFELTER, BOWEN, in their individual capacity, SANDRA BOWEN, PINAL COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT, an agency of Pinal County, COUNTY OF PINAL, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, AMANDA HEINBAUGH, ROD MCKONE, CLODFELTER, in their individual capacity, HEINBAUGH, in their individual capacity and MCKONE, in their individual capacity and as Chief Probation Officer |
| THE ESTATE OF CRYSTA PROCTOR, by and through Chris Maples, Personal Representative and CHRIS MAPLES, herself and on behalf of Crysta Proctor's minor children |
| 20-15917 |
| May 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellants Chris Maples and The Estate of Crysta Proctor to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Chris Maples and The Estate of Crysta Proctor opening brief due 08/12/2020. Appellees Bowen, Sandra Bowen, Clodfelter, Jessica Clodfelter, County of Pinal, Heinbaugh, Amanda Heinbaugh, McKone, Rod McKone and Pinal County Adult Probation Department answering brief due 09/11/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11743314] (DLM) [Entered: 07/06/2020 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Chris Maples and The Estate of Crysta Proctor. New requested due date is 08/12/2020. [11743163] [20-15917] (Bailey, Jenna) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11712941] (BLS) [Entered: 06/05/2020 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 06/05/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11699307] (BLS) [Entered: 05/22/2020 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11698625]. [20-15917] (AD) [Entered: 05/21/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Chris Maples Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/21/2020. [11698608] [20-15917] (Bailey, Jenna) [Entered: 05/21/2020 05:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Chris Maples and The Estate of Crysta Proctor Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/21/2020. Appellants Chris Maples and The Estate of Crysta Proctor opening brief due 07/13/2020. Appellees Bowen, Sandra Bowen, Clodfelter, Jessica Clodfelter, County of Pinal, Heinbaugh, Amanda Heinbaugh, McKone, Rod McKone and Pinal County Adult Probation Department answering brief due 08/12/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11690634] (JBS) [Entered: 05/14/2020 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
