Lucinda Lozano, et al v. County of Santa Clara, et al
LUCINDA LOZANO, JOHNNY LOZANO, Sr., individually and as heirs to Johnny Lozano, Jr., deceased and ESTATE OF JOHNNY LOZANO, JR. |
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, TROY BELIVEAU, in his individual and official capacity, ALEXANDER CHYORNY, in his individual and official capacity, JEFFREY NEKOMOTO, LAURIE SMITH, in her individual and official capacity, SEAN KANAKARAJ, SUSAN ZHAO and KRISTIN WALSH |
20-15992 |
May 22, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
LUCINDA LOZANO V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellants Estate of Johnny Lozano, Jr., Johnny Lozano, Sr. and Lucinda Lozano to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Estate of Johnny Lozano, Jr., Johnny Lozano Sr. and Lucinda Lozano opening brief due 08/19/2020. Appellees Troy Beliveau, Alexander Chyorny, County of Santa Clara, Sean Kanakaraj, Jeffrey Nekomoto, Laurie Smith, Kristin Walsh and Susan Zhao answering brief due 09/18/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11749994] (JN) [Entered: 07/13/2020 08:11 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Estate of Johnny Lozano, Jr., Johnny Lozano, Sr. and Lucinda Lozano. New requested due date is 08/19/2020. [11749765] [20-15992] (Marinho, Sarah) [Entered: 07/12/2020 01:19 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator by email should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11738097] (VS) [Entered: 06/30/2020 11:40 AM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 06/30/2020, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11717001] (VS) [Entered: 06/10/2020 08:55 AM] |
Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/31/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11706064]. [20-15992] (AD) [Entered: 05/31/2020 06:44 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Estate of Johnny Lozano, Jr., Johnny Lozano, Sr. and Lucinda Lozano Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/31/2020. [11706059] [20-15992] (Marinho, Sarah) [Entered: 05/31/2020 02:57 PM] |
Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-15992: Paid] ). Receipt number: 0971-14497058. [11699022] (JBS) [Entered: 05/22/2020 10:30 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Estate of Johnny Lozano, Jr., Johnny Lozano Sr. and Lucinda Lozano Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/29/2020. Appellants Estate of Johnny Lozano, Jr., Johnny Lozano Sr. and Lucinda Lozano opening brief due 07/20/2020. Appellees Troy Beliveau, Alexander Chyorny, County of Santa Clara, Sean Kanakaraj, Jeffrey Nekomoto, Laurie Smith, Kristin Walsh and Susan Zhao answering brief due 08/19/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11699010] (JBS) [Entered: 05/22/2020 10:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.