Pacific Rim Land Development, v. Imperial Pacific International
| PACIFIC RIM LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC |
| IMPERIAL PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL (CNMI), LLC |
| 20-16047 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| PACIFIC RIM LAND DEVELOPMENT, V. IMPERIAL PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN w/ counsel for defendant, FurtherConference, 07/23/2020, 4:00 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [11754428] (VS) [Entered: 07/15/2020 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN w/ counsel for plaintiff, FurtherConference, 07/21/2020, 4:30 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [11754413] (VS) [Entered: 07/15/2020 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 07/15/2020, 4:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11725964] (VS) [Entered: 06/18/2020 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11711418] (JFF) [Entered: 06/04/2020 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/02/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11709201]. [20-16047] (AD) [Entered: 06/03/2020 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/02/2020. [11709152] [20-16047] (Dotts, Michael) [Entered: 06/02/2020 10:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/05/2020. Transcript ordered by 06/30/2020. Transcript due 07/28/2020. Appellant Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC opening brief due 09/08/2020. Appellee Pacific Rim Land Development, LLC answering brief due 10/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11705266] (RT) [Entered: 05/29/2020 01:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pacific Rim Land Development, v. Imperial Pacific International | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: PACIFIC RIM LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Colin Murphy Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: IMPERIAL PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL (CNMI), LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael W. Dotts Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
