Janet Howell v. BMW Germany, et al
| BENSON LAW FIRM, BMW GERMANY, ATTY SLOAN, BMW NHTSA WI, SNEIDER CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS INC, BMW HI, NATEX FOR AMSTO, PENTAGON CAR SALES, ELIZA AMOGUIS, LEGAL SHIELD, BEN MARTIN and THE RICKEL LAW FIRM, P.C. |
| JANET C. HOWELL |
| 20-16049 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (SPG, KMW and RDN) [11758169] (NAC) [Entered: 07/20/2020 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued any orders that are final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court); In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered in the district court on May 29, 2020. DISMISSED. [11735106] (OC) [Entered: 06/26/2020 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 1 copies of Appellant Janet C. Howell opening brief of 31 pages (Informal: No). Served on 06/22/2020. [11729524] (KWG) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Janet C. Howell opening brief due 07/27/2020. [11705307] (JBS) [Entered: 05/29/2020 01:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
