Anna Womack v. Cincinnati Bell, et al
| ANNA M. WOMACK |
| CINCINNATI BELL and AMERICAN EXPRESS |
| 20-16051 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Anna M. Womack citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 07/27/2020. [11768253] [20-16051] (Womack, Anna) [Entered: 07/27/2020 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Anna M. Womack motion to request right to e-file; declaration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/08/2020. [11765417] (RL) [Entered: 07/24/2020 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Anna M. Womack direct violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964, sworn declaration. Dated 07/08/2020. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11747811] (RL) [Entered: 07/09/2020 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 06/05/2020. [11716021] (RT) [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11707062] (CKP) [Entered: 06/01/2020 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anna M. Womack opening brief due 07/27/2020. Appellees American Express and Cincinnati Bell answering brief due 08/26/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11705332] (JBS) [Entered: 05/29/2020 02:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
