Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
| GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, ALBIN RHOMBERG, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis, SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, AKA Susan Tennenbaum and BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD PASADENA AND SAN GABRIEL VALLEY, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD GULF COAST, PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California, PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES and PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST |
| TROY NEWMAN |
| 20-16068 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION, ET AL V. CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record and appellants unopposed motions to hold these appeals in abeyance (Docket Entry No. 5 in No. 20-16068; Docket Entry No. 5 in No. 20-16070) reveals that the notices of appeal were filed during the pendency of timely filed motions listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notices of appeal are therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, the motions are granted, and appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the last such pending motion, appellants shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellants intend to prosecute their respective appeals. To appeal the district courts ruling(s) on the post-judgment motions, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11746179] (TSP) [Entered: 07/08/2020 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: These cases are RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeals are pending. [11737131] [20-16068, 20-16070] (CL) [Entered: 06/29/2020 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Troy Newman Unopposed Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 06/16/2020. [11724194] [20-16068] (White, Edward) [Entered: 06/16/2020 05:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 06/26/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11720065] [20-16068, 20-16070] (CL) [Entered: 06/12/2020 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/08/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11715123]. [20-16068] (AD) [Entered: 06/08/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Troy Newman Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/08/2020. [11715107] [20-16068] (White, Edward) [Entered: 06/08/2020 06:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Troy Newman Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/08/2020. Transcript ordered by 06/29/2020. Transcript due 07/27/2020. Appellant Troy Newman opening brief due 09/08/2020. Appellees Parenthood California Central Coast, Inc., Planned Parenthood Center For Choice, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Los Angeles, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc., Planned Parenthood Of The Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc., Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest, Planned Parenthood/Orange and San Bernardino Counties, Inc. and Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. answering brief due 10/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11706654] (JBS) [Entered: 06/01/2020 11:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
