Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
| TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD, HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON SA, SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., HITACHI ASIA, LTD., SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V., PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA., TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA., PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED, HITACHI, LTD., MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC. and HITACHI AMERICA, LTD |
| INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS |
| In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION |
| THE ESTATE OF BARBARA CALDWELL, ANTHONY GIANASCA, CAROLYN JORGENSEN, WARREN CUTLIP, Proposed Intervenors and GEORGE MAGLARAS |
| 20-16081 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SZ):Appellants motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the portion of their appeal which seeks review of the district courts March 11, 2020 order granting preliminary approval of the class settlement (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The panel that decided appeal No. 16-16368 will retain jurisdiction over this appeal. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 3.6. The opening brief due September 8, 2020. The answering brief due October 8, 2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11773415] (JPD) [Entered: 07/31/2020 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 06/30/2020. [11737905] [20-16081] (Bonsignore, Robert) [Entered: 06/30/2020 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 06/23/2020. [11731380] (RT) [Entered: 06/23/2020 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11717553] (TSP) [Entered: 06/10/2020 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11717398] (VS) [Entered: 06/10/2020 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/09/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11716739]. [20-16081] (AD) [Entered: 06/09/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Anthony Gianasca, Warren Cutlip, The Estate of Barbara Caldwell, George Maglaras and Carolyn Jorgensen Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/09/2020. [11716011] [20-16081] (Bonsignore, Robert) [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/09/2020. Transcript ordered by 06/29/2020. Transcript due 07/27/2020. Appellants Warren Cutlip, Anthony Gianasca, Carolyn Jorgensen, George Maglaras and The Estate of Barbara Caldwell opening brief due 09/08/2020. Appellees Hitachi America, Ltd, Hitachi Asia, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, MT Picture Display Co., LTD, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Koninklijke N.V., Philips Taiwan Limited, Philips do Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN BHD, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Thomson SA, Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation answering brief due 10/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11708891] (RT) [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
