Isaiah Hoover v. Swift Transportation Company, et al
Defendant / Appellee: KEN, TIMMY DALE, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, GUSTAVO and KATRINA WEEMS
Plaintiff / Appellant: ISAIAH HOOVER
Case Number: 20-16088
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 12, 2021 ISAIAH HOOVER V. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2020 Filing 10 Added Attorney Andrew Bryan Kleiner for Appellee Swift Transportation Company, in case 20-16088. [11765876] (HH) [Entered: 07/24/2020 04:58 PM]
July 24, 2020 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew Bryan Kleiner (2525 E. Camelback Road, Suite 450, Phoenix, AZ 85016) for Appellee Swift Transportation Company. Date of service: 07/24/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11765825] [20-16088] (Kleiner, Andrew) [Entered: 07/24/2020 04:39 PM]
July 6, 2020 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Isaiah Hoover Statement that appeal should go forward [11743089] (NAC) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:06 PM]
July 6, 2020 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Isaiah Hoover motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11743080] (NAC) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:04 PM]
June 23, 2020 Filing 6 Entered appearance of Court Reporter Rudy Apodaca in this case. [11731104] [18-10435, 19-15352, 19-15518, 19-15610, 19-15732, 19-17071, 19-99008, 20-10086, 20-15860, 20-16088] (RY) [Entered: 06/23/2020 03:05 PM]
June 23, 2020 Filing 5 Terminated participation of Court Reporter Laurie Anne Adams in this case. [11731076] [20-10023, 20-10086, 20-10155, 20-10177, 20-15163, 20-15807, 20-15296, 20-15797, 20-15814, 20-15860, 20-16015, 20-16072, 20-16088, 20-16218] (RY) [Entered: 06/23/2020 02:55 PM]
June 10, 2020 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11717607] (CKP) [Entered: 06/10/2020 01:47 PM]
June 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/09/2020. IT IS ORDERED: (1) In compliance with the Ninth Circuit's June 5, 2020 Referral Notice, (Doc. 71 ), the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that an appeal of the Court's April 30, 2020 Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith. (2) The Clerk of Court must immediately notify the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the parties of this denial. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(4). The Clerk of Court must indicate that this Order relates to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' docket number 20-16088. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/9/2020. [11715538] (NAC) [Entered: 06/09/2020 09:53 AM]
June 5, 2020 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11712507] (CKP) [Entered: 06/05/2020 12:02 PM]
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 06/29/2020. Transcript due 07/28/2020. Appellant Isaiah Hoover opening brief due 09/08/2020. Appellees Timmy Dale, Gustavo, Ken, Swift Transportation Company and Katrina Weems answering brief due 10/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11709905] (JBS) [Entered: 06/03/2020 01:45 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Isaiah Hoover v. Swift Transportation Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TIMMY DALE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Represented By: Jason Richard Mullis
Represented By: Andrew Bryan Kleiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GUSTAVO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KATRINA WEEMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ISAIAH HOOVER
Represented By: Isaiah Hoover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?