Michael Petramala v. Arizona, State of, et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, CITY OF SCOTTSDALE and ARIZONA, STATE OF |
| MICHAEL PETRAMALA |
| 20-16178 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/22/2020. ORDER - The Ninth Circuit having referred the matter to this Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or is taken in bad faith, IT IS ORDERED that the Court does not elect to revoke in forma pauperis status. [11729073] (QDL) [Entered: 06/22/2020 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11726266] (CKP) [Entered: 06/18/2020 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Petramala opening brief due 08/24/2020. Appellees Arizona, State of, City of Scottsdale, United States Attorney General and United States of America answering brief due 09/24/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11724537] (RT) [Entered: 06/17/2020 09:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
