Aaron Beitch v. Chris Magnus, et al
| COLIN JEFFERSON HYDE, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #49273, CHELSEA LYNN GUTIERREZ, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #37097, CHRIS MAGNUS, Chief of Police Tucson Police Department, DENNIS J. MILLER, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #42405, BRENDAN WIBERG, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #101692, CYNTHIA KOZDA, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #101839, JUSTIN LANE, Lieutenant Office of Professional Standards, ROBERT JUDE MIRANDA, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #46937, MICKEY PETERSON, Sergeant Office of Professional Standards, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #100504, PAULINA REED, Tucson Police Officer, Badge #101286 and DAVID W. HILL, Tucson Police Sergeant, Badge #46938 |
| AARON HARVEY BEITCH |
| 20-16188 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Streamlined request by Appellant Aaron Harvey Beitch to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11789939] (JN) [Entered: 08/14/2020 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 Received from Appellant Aaron Harvey Beitch 4 USB drives containing audio and video exhibits. Deficiency: motion to transmit physical exhibits required. Notified Appellant. [11789884] (LA) [Entered: 08/14/2020 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 Received original and 3 copies of Appellant Aaron Harvey Beitch opening brief of 19 pages (Informal: No); 4 copies of excerpts of record in 1 volume. Served on 08/11/2020. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed (motion to appoint counsel is pending). [11789875] (LA) [Entered: 08/14/2020 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Correct Entry: [ # 8 ]. [11789869] (LA) [Entered: 08/14/2020 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request received on 08/14/2020. [11789810] (JR) [Entered: 08/14/2020 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 Received Appellant Aaron Harvey Beitch request for copy docket sheet and FRAP Rules. [11789755] (NAC) [Entered: 08/14/2020 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Aaron Harvey Beitch motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11789751] (NAC) [Entered: 08/14/2020 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11744707] (NAC) [Entered: 07/07/2020 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district court record reflects that appellant did not sign the notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(2) (notice of appeal considered filed on behalf of the signer); see also Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 765 (2001) (pro se litigants failure to sign the notice of appeal is a nonjurisdictional, and therefore, curable defect); McKinney v. Debord, 507 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1974) (pro se appellant must personally sign notice of appeal). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall correct the defect by filing a signed copy of the notice of appeal in the district court. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [11732143] (CKP) [Entered: 06/24/2020 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Aaron Harvey Beitch opening brief due 08/17/2020. Appellees Chelsea Lynn Gutierrez, David W. Hill, Colin Jefferson Hyde, Cynthia Kozda, Justin Lane, Chris Magnus, Dennis J. Miller, Robert Jude Miranda, Mickey Peterson, Paulina Reed, Daniel Rodriguez and Brendan Wiberg answering brief due 09/14/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11725941] (JPD) [Entered: 06/18/2020 10:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
