Renard Polk v. Ranaldo Waldo, et al
| QUENTIN BYRNE, KELLY BELANGER, TARA CARPENTER, RENEE BAKER, Warden, DWAYNE BAZE and WILLIAM MOORE |
| RENARD TRUMAN POLK |
| JAMES DONNELLY and RANALDO WALDO |
| 20-16250 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and DANIEL A. BRESS) Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) is denied. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. The opening brief is due October 6, 2020; the answering brief is due November 5, 2020; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, the excerpts of record requirement is waived. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.2. Appellees supplemental excerpts of record are limited to the district court docket sheet, the notice of appeal, the judgment or order appealed from, and any specific portions of the record cited in the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.7. [11795131] (OC) [Entered: 08/19/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 11 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request filed on 08/17/2020. [11791781] (JR) [Entered: 08/17/2020 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Renard Truman Polk letter dated 08/12/2020 re: Request for rules book. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11791744] (RL) [Entered: 08/17/2020 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 9 Streamlined request by Appellant Renard Truman Polk to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11791649] (JN) [Entered: 08/17/2020 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees James Donnelly and Ranaldo Waldo response opposing motion ([ # 7 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 07/27/2020. [11767718] [20-16250] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 07/27/2020 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Renard Truman Polk FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/12/2020. [11755687] (RL) [Entered: 07/16/2020 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11752227] (CKP) [Entered: 07/14/2020 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 07/03/2020. [Case Number 20-16250: Partially Paid] [11747550] (RL) [Entered: 07/09/2020 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorneys Steven Paul Edwards substituted by Attorneys Frank Anthony Toddre II [11741464] (JFF) [Entered: 07/02/2020 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Frank A. Toddre (State of Nevada Office of The Attorney General, 555 E. Washington Avenue Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellees James Donnelly and Ranaldo Waldo. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Steven Paul Edwards for Appellees James Donnelly and Ranaldo Waldo. Date of service: 07/02/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11740953] [20-16250] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 07/02/2020 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11736561] (CKP) [Entered: 06/29/2020 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Renard Truman Polk opening brief due 08/24/2020. Appellees James Donnelly and Ranaldo Waldo answering brief due 09/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11734160] (JPD) [Entered: 06/25/2020 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
