Enoma Igbinovia v. James Dzurenda, et al
| CLAUDE WILLIS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., JAMES G. COX, MICHAEL OXBORROW, RENEE BAKER, Warden, ELDON MCDANIEL, DEBORAH BROOKS, DWAYNE DEAL, MELISSA TRAVIS and JAMES DZURENDA |
| ENOMA IGBINOVIA |
| 20-16259 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ENOMA IGBINOVIA V. JAMES DZURENDA |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Enoma Igbinovia letter dated 08/14/2020 re: Supplement financial certificate. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11798775] (QDL) [Entered: 08/21/2020 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Enoma Igbinovia statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 08/09/2020. [11793817] (RL) [Entered: 08/18/2020 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Enoma Igbinovia FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/07/2020. [11793814] (RL) [Entered: 08/18/2020 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 06/29/2020). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11786805] (CKP) [Entered: 08/12/2020 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11736994] (CKP) [Entered: 06/29/2020 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Enoma Igbinovia motion for the appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/22/2020. [11736794] (RL) [Entered: 06/29/2020 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES . SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Enoma Igbinovia opening brief due 08/24/2020. [11735141] (JPD) [Entered: 06/26/2020 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
