Vilaychith Khouanmany v. US Marshal Service, et al
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ALENCASTRE, US MARSHAL SERVICE and KEVIN DEPPE |
VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY |
20-16285 |
July 1, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11763299] (JPD) [Entered: 07/23/2020 10:34 AM] |
Filing 4 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Vilaychith Khouanmany opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/13/2020. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: motion to appoint pro bono counsel pending. [11758238] (SML) [Entered: 07/20/2020 09:39 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Vilaychith Khouanmany motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11755379] (NAC) [Entered: 07/16/2020 01:15 PM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/07/2020, denying appellant's motion to appoint counsel. [11744468] (DL) [Entered: 07/07/2020 01:06 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Vilaychith Khouanmany opening brief due 08/31/2020. Appellees Alencastre, Kevin Deppe, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and US Marshal Service answering brief due 10/01/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11739883] (RT) [Entered: 07/01/2020 01:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.