Vegas Property Services, Inc. v. FNMA/Fannie Mae, et al
| WILLIAM RICHARD COLEMAN, THELMA COLEMAN, FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC, ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC and DESERT SHORES RACQUET CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
| FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION |
| VEGAS PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. |
| 20-16320 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11809455] (MS) [Entered: 09/01/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Vegas Property Services, Inc. response to Court order dated 08/17/2020. Date of service: 08/17/2020. [11791061] [20-16320] (Yergensen, Chris) [Entered: 08/17/2020 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 09/01/2020, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11777504] (BLS) [Entered: 08/04/2020 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11767658] (AF) [Entered: 07/27/2020 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 08/04/2020, 2:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11760600] (BLS) [Entered: 07/21/2020 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/15/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11754527]. [20-16320] (AD) [Entered: 07/15/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Vegas Property Services, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/15/2020. [11754227] [20-16320] (Yergensen, Chris) [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Vegas Property Services, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/15/2020. Transcript ordered by 08/06/2020. Transcript due 09/08/2020. Appellant Vegas Property Services, Inc. opening brief due 10/15/2020. Appellee Federal National Mortgage Association answering brief due 11/16/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11746145] (JBS) [Entered: 07/08/2020 02:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
