Shavez Evans v. Wingett, et al
| SHAVEZ EVANS |
| ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SMITH, COII at ADC, WINGETT, Sgt. at ADC and ANDERSON, COII at ADC |
| 20-16343 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, MMS and CMC) [11789070] (JFF) [Entered: 08/14/2020 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable); see also In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11763951] (OC) [Entered: 07/23/2020 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shavez Evans opening brief due 09/14/2020. [11748683] (RT) [Entered: 07/10/2020 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
