Carlos Radcliffe v. County of Santa Clara, et al
| CARLOS RADCLIFFE |
| COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and ALEXANDER CHYORNY |
| 20-16349 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CARLOS RADCLIFFE V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant Carlos Radcliffe opening brief of 12 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 08/13/2020. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed (appointment of counsel pending). [11791883] (KWG) [Entered: 08/17/2020 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11768479] (CKP) [Entered: 07/28/2020 07:52 AM] |
| Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request received on 07/27/2020. [11767926] (JR) [Entered: 07/27/2020 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 Received Appellant Carlos Radcliffe request for copy of FRAP Rules. [11767759] (NAC) [Entered: 07/27/2020 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 07/20/2020. [11767753] (NAC) [Entered: 07/27/2020 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Carlos Radcliffe motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11767750] (NAC) [Entered: 07/27/2020 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11752025] (CKP) [Entered: 07/14/2020 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Carlos Radcliffe opening brief due 09/04/2020. Appellees Alexander Chyorny and County of Santa Clara answering brief due 10/05/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11750874] (JPD) [Entered: 07/13/2020 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
